Big Tech, Censorship, and Socialism

The judges found no precedent in granting this type of request.

Meta says it has given users options for more political content recommendations, and limited penalties for content violations to persistent offenders only.

The federal health agency will no longer prohibit posts with what it deems ’misleading‘ or ’demonstrably false' information.

Rep. Steve Scalise has expressed concerns that the current version of KOSA would give the federal government more censorship power.

The ruling leaves in place an appeals court order requiring a South Carolina department to hand over records that Google says it needs for its legal defense.

The order comes after the Supreme Court found Missouri, Louisiana lacked standing to block the Biden administration’s communicating with social media companies.

The Ninth Circuit allowed the multibillion-dollar lawsuit to proceed after a federal district court threw out the shareholders’ claims three times.

Several platform features induce youngsters into an ‘extended, addictive, and compulsive use’ of these services, the plaintiffs claim.

The court decision follows a series of compliance measures taken by the social media company, including paying about $5.4 million in fines.

An amended lawsuit alleges the government and social media companies continue to cooperate to limit free speech.

Toyota has scaled back some of its DEI efforts, halting LGBT sponsorships, and exiting external DEI rankings.

The new pact ‘does nothing to advance U.S. interests,’ House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman says.

Molson Coors is scaling back its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, including changes to executive compensation and employee-training programs.

The site was still working normally in Brazil on Aug. 30, but the platform went offline a day later.

‘I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,’ Mark Zuckerberg wrote.

‘The Court finds that there is further risk for future risk injury here because Kennedy is a 2024 presidential candidate,’ the judge wrote.

The social media giant argues that omitting a major user data breach from a government filing does not make it liable in a class-action lawsuit.

The former president’s name was omitted from Google’s autocomplete feature after his near-assassination.

The news network’s allegedly defamatory statements either were not about her or were true, the judge said.