Oklahoma attorney general supported Richard Glossip’s appeal after state courts ruled against him.

Petitioner Edgardo Esteras argues courts are forbidden from using certain factors when arriving at their decision.

The Seventh Circuit ruled against those who challenged a bubble zone law in March 2024, finding precedent barred the appeal.

The justices rejected the company’s argument that the False Claims Act did not apply to the case.

The survivors argued they are allowed to sue in U.S. courts because their property was seized in violation of international law.

Higher education groups and Baltimore officials argue the executive orders violate existing law and exceed presidential powers.

Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger argues he may be fired only for misconduct. He says his termination letter cited no reason for the firing.

The plaintiffs said DOGE is breaking federal laws and that recent executive orders on DEI and transgender ideology are unconstitutional.

The nonprofits argue the orders violate federal law and interfere with their ability to provide services to the public.

The lawsuit, filed the same day that the federal government rescinded approval for the program, claims the government is breaking federal law.