Courts

‘We shall not micromanage the efforts of a fine district judge attempting to implement the Supreme Court’s recent decision,’ the court states.

Three district courts previously issued separate orders blocking Trump’s policy.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed a win to the Trump administration on Wednesday evening.

Lower courts previously found the university employees didn’t have enough evidence to proceed.

The Washington Supreme Court ruled in February that the officers do not have a right to remain anonymous.

The judge directed further briefing and hearing on appropriate remedies.

Boasberg scheduled a hearing after the plaintiffs requested another temporary restraining order against the administration.

The filing comes a week after the Supreme Court temporarily paused lower court orders preventing the firing of two Biden appointees.

The Eighth Circuit has halted its freeze on the Iowa immigration law after the DOJ dropped a lawsuit against it brought under the Biden administration.

Judge Paula Xinis had issued another order after a request for clarification from the Supreme Court.

The programs help provide information to unrepresented illegal immigrants about their rights and obligations throughout removal proceedings.

The Supreme Court vacated the order and said the lawsuit was brought in the wrong court.

‘This ruling is unconstitutional and will not stand,’ Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said.

The president accused the law firm of weaponizing the legal system and undermining election integrity.

Federal agencies freeze $2.2 billion and accuse the university of reinforcing an entitlement mindset and violating civil rights laws.

More than 100 lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration. So far, of seven emergency motions, the president has won five and lost two.

During a hearing on April 15, the judge said the record didn’t demonstrate the administration complied with her order.

Defense attorney Kristy Militello said ‘intent is the paramount issue’ for the court and jury to decide in Routh’s case.

The legal fight over credit card late fees ended with a major victory for business groups challenging Consumer Financial Protection Bureau regulations.