Courts

Justices cite their recent Fischer v. United States ruling that a financial law does not apply in an obstruction of official proceedings case.

The defense is arguing that prejudicial statements related to the former president’s official acts in office were presented by the district attorney at trial.

The court determined that Mr. Giuliani made ‘knowing falsehoods’ regarding the 2020 election with the ’intent to deceive.’

The Republican National Committee on July 1 filed an emergency motion to stay a lower court decision.

The new law was named in honor of Marie Varsos and her mother Debbie Sisco, who were fatally shot by Ms. Varsos’s estranged husband in April 2021.

The judge issued a limited relief to the state of Texas as an employer.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented, saying current federal law gives social media platforms ‘a get-out-of-jail free card.’

Justice Clarence Thomas said he hoped the court would consider what kinds of weapons are constitutional.

Both responded after the Supreme Court’s 6–3 ruling that presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for “official acts.”

Much has been remanded back to the District Court to decide—for now.

A lawsuit filed on behalf of Oct. 7 victims and families, seeks to hold Iran, Syria, and North Korea liable for providing support for Hamas.

The 44-year-old former college lecturer was accused of running over her boyfriend, a Boston police officer, and leaving him for dead.

The former adviser to President Donald Trump was sentenced to four months in prison.

The high court remanded the case back to the district court overseeing the case.

Both state laws required platforms to explain their content moderation decisions.

Presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution for official acts, the majority ruled.

A North Dakota truck stop argued that a six-year limit on filing suit against a regulation was unfair because it opened after that period had elapsed.

The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to release its final opinions on July 1, the last day of the current term.

Alec Baldwin’s lawyers had requested that the court dismiss the charge against him on the basis of ‘the State’s destruction of evidence.’