Constitutional Rights

Critics of the rule argue that the diversity requirement violates the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment.

President Joe Biden’s declaration that the Equal Rights Amendment is ’the law of the land' has met with resistance.

U.S. Circuit Judge Kent A. Jordan said in a new opinion that the Second Amendment applies to all adults, not just those 21 and older.

The Fifth Circuit upheld the state law last year.

TikTok Inc. and President-elect Donald Trump are asking the nation’s highest court to prevent the law from taking effect.

A local law in Illinois forbids approaching women outside clinics to advise of abortion alternatives.

A court has overturned a felon-in-possession ban for Bryan Range, ruling that a food-stamp fraud conviction doesn’t justify Second Amendment right restrictions.

The amendment, which provides protections on the basis of gender preference, exists in a legal gray area and would be extensively litigated.

A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that the charity’s activities were not of a sufficiently religious character to justify tax exemption.

Three justices criticized the Hawaii Supreme Court ruling allowing the defendant to be prosecuted.

Two justices dissented, saying the high court’s ruling contradicts its decision last year striking down affirmative action in college admissions.

The bill would begin the constitutional amendment process, which requires supermajority support in Congress and three quarters of the states for ratification.

A Maryland-based judge found that ‘a racially diverse officer corps is a national security interest.’

Patel is a longtime critic of the federal agency he’s now poised to lead.

The federal health agency will no longer prohibit posts with what it deems ’misleading‘ or ’demonstrably false' information.

A gun shop in Michigan wanted to build a gun range but the local township said the land wasn’t zoned for that use.

Walmart said it will also ‘identify and remove inappropriate sexual and/or transgender products marketed to children.’

Two justices expressed concern about the prospect of the government damaging homes without paying compensation.

The plaintiff said the law requiring her to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings infringed on her constitutional rights.

The Second Circuit previously ruled building owners’ rights were not violated because they could still evict tenants in limited circumstances.