Constitutional Rights

Justice Clarence Thomas said he hoped the court would consider what kinds of weapons are constitutional.

Both state laws required platforms to explain their content moderation decisions.

The total project spans five states: Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. It will slice through 2,500 miles of land.

Activists had claimed the local law unfairly punished people whose poverty forced them to camp in public.

The court ruled 6–3 that the SEC cannot use its in-house administrative tribunals to enforce civil penalties.

The complaint alleges that five people brought operations at the Fort Myers Health Center to a halt for at least one hour in 2022.

States had argued the federal government strong-armed social media platforms into toeing the party line on various issues.

The spending is to ‘defend abortion access and get out the vote,’ Planned Parenthood said.

‘Firearm violence is a public health crisis. Our failure to address it is a moral crisis,’ Dr. Murthy said.

The suit brought by parents alleges that the law violates students’ religious freedom.

Justices denied petitions from a nonprofit founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

A jeweler claims that the police lied about his statements and had no legal basis to move against him.

The high court tends to release all its decisions for a term by the end of June, and only several days remain in the month.

The Texas Attorney General’s office brought the lawsuit, saying the law violates the Second Amendment.

Supreme Court shouldn’t have ruled in favor of a law that restricts gun ownership, justice says.

Bill states that land use regulation is the responsibility of state and local governments, but now federal support is needed to achieve ’reforms.’

Changing expert witnesses at trial infringed the man’s right to confront witnesses against him, the Court found.

The issue was ‘consular nonreviewability,’ the legal principle that a consular official’s denial of a visa cannot be fought in court.

A federal appeals court had invalidated a 1994 federal law that prohibits a person who is subject to a domestic restraining order from having firearms.

A firearm industry association executive called the move ‘a powerful statement that the Second Amendment rights of Louisianans are not negotiable.’