Constitutional Rights

A court has overturned a felon-in-possession ban for Bryan Range, ruling that a food-stamp fraud conviction doesn’t justify Second Amendment right restrictions.

The amendment, which provides protections on the basis of gender preference, exists in a legal gray area and would be extensively litigated.

A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that the charity’s activities were not of a sufficiently religious character to justify tax exemption.

Three justices criticized the Hawaii Supreme Court ruling allowing the defendant to be prosecuted.

Two justices dissented, saying the high court’s ruling contradicts its decision last year striking down affirmative action in college admissions.

The bill would begin the constitutional amendment process, which requires supermajority support in Congress and three quarters of the states for ratification.

A Maryland-based judge found that ‘a racially diverse officer corps is a national security interest.’

Patel is a longtime critic of the federal agency he’s now poised to lead.

The federal health agency will no longer prohibit posts with what it deems ’misleading‘ or ’demonstrably false' information.

A gun shop in Michigan wanted to build a gun range but the local township said the land wasn’t zoned for that use.

Walmart said it will also ‘identify and remove inappropriate sexual and/or transgender products marketed to children.’

Two justices expressed concern about the prospect of the government damaging homes without paying compensation.

The plaintiff said the law requiring her to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings infringed on her constitutional rights.

The Second Circuit previously ruled building owners’ rights were not violated because they could still evict tenants in limited circumstances.

Judge Stephen McGlynn ruled that the law does not comport with the Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen.

Gun advocates want executive orders issued by Biden rescinded.

A state law aims to remedy past discrimination but grants benefits based on applicant’s race without proof of actual discrimination, a group’s lawyer says.

The plaintiff argued that the District’s magazine cap is unconstitutional according to a test that the Supreme Court articulated in the 2022 Bruen ruling.

The justices sent the case back to the 11th Circuit for a second look in light of a recent ruling.

Massachusetts supported the attorney’s appeal, citing a recent Supreme Court ruling on Sixth Amendment rights.