Throughout U.S. history, women have served a vital role on the front lines in every war and conflict. In fact, many women disguised themselves as men to fight in combat in the Revolutionary War.
Rogers witnessed how women who helped during World War I were treated. She was adamant that things had to change if the United States found itself in another war. “I was resolved that our women would not again serve with the Army without the same protection the men got,” Rogers stated, according to the U.S. Army website.
WAAC Established
The day after he signed the bill, President Roosevelt set a recruitment goal of 25,000 for the first year. But that goal was unexpectedly exceeded right away. Oveta Culp Hobby (1905–1995) was chosen as the WAAC’s first leader, and a training camp was established in Des Moines, Iowa.When the WAAC was first formed, women were paid the same as men while in the country, but they were ineligible for overseas pay and benefits in the case of death. This changed in 1943, when the army asked Congress to change the auxiliary status of women who served. After some debate, Congress eventually agreed, and the WAAC became the Women’s Army Corps (WAC) on July 3, 1943.
Slander
At first, women all over the country flocked to recruitment offices to join the WAAC. Then in 1943, a slander campaign painted women serving in the military in a negative light. WAAC leader Hobby demanded an investigation into the slander campaign, as she suspected it was the work of the enemy Axis forces. The investigation instead determined that efforts to slander women in the WAAC were conducted by soldiers’ wives, jealous civilian women, disgruntled discharged WAACs, and male Army personnel.
Despite the slowdown in recruitment, around 150,000 women served some type of role in the WAAC and WAC during WWII. Even though some tried to portray the women who served in a negative way, Gen. Douglas MacArthur (1880–1964) said otherwise. He once called the WACs his best soldiers, saying they were better disciplined, worked harder, and complained less than their male counterparts.
Women continued to serve in the WAC after WWII ended. Then they were called to action again during the Korean War. In 1962, a group of WACs was sent to Vietnam to help train South Vietnamese women to provide similar support to their soldiers.
In 1976, the first female cadets enrolled at the U.S. Army’s West Point Academy, and the WAC was officially disbanded in 1978. While women were allowed within the male ranks, the transition didn’t come easily.
In the Army
“I was in for the short period of time when we had the basic training with the men,” U.S. Army veteran Yvonne Wilson, who served for 15 years, told The Epoch Times. “From 1979 to 1983, I think it was tougher for females to go through basic training because the standards were much higher than they are now. [It changed] once they established the fact that they shouldn’t have men and women training together in basic training. So I think that was a tough time for women in the military—that transition from WAC to regular army.”Overall, Wilson said that being a woman in a man’s world made her a stronger person. She and other female veterans agree that the establishment of the WAAC in 1942 definitely led to women serving in the military after that. It helped them obtain equal pay as men in the military, as they do today.
Veteran Jody Larreau served in the U.S. Army for 26 years. “When the early women joined the WAAC, they paved the way for the totally integrated force, which I was part of,” Larreau told The Epoch Times. “If they hadn’t been able to join, then it would have never been allowed open for the rest of us.
“The military gives you non-tangibles: a sense of belonging to something greater than yourself and being a part of something. It gives you the pride and camaraderie and everything that you can’t buy because you are part of something so much greater than yourself for such a greater cause.”