The Enduring Image of George Washington and the Hippopotamus

As part of our ‘Great Art in America’ series, we focus on the portraits of George Washington by Gilbert Stuart.
The Enduring Image of George Washington and the Hippopotamus
George Washington (Athenaeum Portrait), 1796, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on canvas; 47 3/4 inches by 37 inches. William Francis Warden Fund, John H. and Ernestine A. Payne Fund, Commonwealth Cultural Preservation Trust. Jointly owned by the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and the National Portrait Gallery, Washington. Public Domain
Lorraine Ferrier
Updated:
0:00

If you’re ever asked to picture George Washington, the first image that comes to mind will most certainly be based on Gilbert Stuart’s portrait of the first president. You know the one, where a distinguished Washington, with flushed cheeks, wears a black velvet suit. His powdered hair has been curled and tied with a black ribbon into a “queue,” a ponytail hairstyle that in Western countries has the hair gathered low in a tail, wrapped around with leather, and tied with a ribbon.

Just take a look at a dollar bill and you'll see Stuart’s Washington on the front, albeit in a mirrored image of the portrait.

That’s the Washington we’ve immortalized, which is rather unfortunate, as the president’s dour expression isn’t an intimate peek into his psychology but rather due to a hippopotamus, namely a set of hippopotamus-ivory dentures. According to the Mount Vernon website, Martha Washington’s grandson (the Washingtons’ adopted son), George Washington Parke Custis, noted that the dentures were “of Sea horse (hippopotamus) ivory teeth. These, just made, were too large and clumsy, and gave that peculiar appearance of the mouth seen in Stuart’s picture.”

The 3 Washingtons

The Washington on our dollar bill comes from Stuart’s Athenaeum Portrait, an unfinished painting of Washington turned to the left. Even though the first lady had commissioned him to paint pendant portraits (a pair of paintings) of the presidential couple for Mount Vernon, Stuart primarily used the incomplete work as a study for copies of the portrait, which were in high demand.
George Washington (Athenaeum Portrait), 1796, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on canvas; 47 3/4 inches by 37 inches. William Francis Warden Fund, John H. and Ernestine A. Payne Fund, Commonwealth Cultural Preservation Trust. Jointly owned by the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and the National Portrait Gallery, Washington. (Public Domain)
George Washington (Athenaeum Portrait), 1796, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on canvas; 47 3/4 inches by 37 inches. William Francis Warden Fund, John H. and Ernestine A. Payne Fund, Commonwealth Cultural Preservation Trust. Jointly owned by the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and the National Portrait Gallery, Washington. Public Domain

The Athenaeum Portrait was one of the three styles of portraits Stuart painted of Washington, based on those he’d painted from life between 1795 and 1796. Washington turns to the right in the bust-length Vaughan Portrait and he turns to the left in the life-size, full-length Lansdowne Portrait.

George Washington (Vaughan Portrait), 1795, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on canvas; 28 3/4 inches by 23 3/4 inches. Andrew W. Mellon Collection; National Gallery of Art, Washington. (Public Domain)
George Washington (Vaughan Portrait), 1795, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on canvas; 28 3/4 inches by 23 3/4 inches. Andrew W. Mellon Collection; National Gallery of Art, Washington. Public Domain
George Washington (Lansdowne Portrait), 1796, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on canvas; 97 1/2 inches by 62 1/2 inches. Acquired as a gift to the nation through the generosity of the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation; National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington. (Public Domain)
George Washington (Lansdowne Portrait), 1796, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on canvas; 97 1/2 inches by 62 1/2 inches. Acquired as a gift to the nation through the generosity of the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation; National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington. Public Domain

Stuart made more than 100 portraits of Washington for American and European patrons, and although Stuart kept true to the president’s likeness throughout, he varied the president’s dress. For instance, in an 1805 version of the Athenaeum Portrait, we see more of Washington’s clothes, and they’re similar to the Vaughan Portrait, with a black velvet suit and a lace “jabot” (a decorative fabric falling from the neck). Stuart also softened Washington’s facial features ever so slightly by using loose brushstrokes, making him appear more relaxed. It’s as if Stuart painted him mellowing with age.

Portrait of George Washington, circa 1805, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on panel; 26 1/4 inches by 21 inches. Public Subscription Fund; Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) Museum, Providence, R. I. (Public Domain)
Portrait of George Washington, circa 1805, by Gilbert Stuart. Oil on panel; 26 1/4 inches by 21 inches. Public Subscription Fund; Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) Museum, Providence, R. I. Public Domain

Stuart had developed his distinct loose brushwork when in London, where, from 1777 to 1782, he was an assistant to fellow American painter Benjamin West and where Stuart exhibited at the Royal Academy of Arts.

“In England my efforts were compared with those of Van Dyck, Titian, and other great painters—but here! They compare them with the works of the Almighty!” he noted, according to the National Gallery of Art.

Painting portraits of the wealthy and famous made Stuart a sought-after portraitist. The first five U.S. presidents sat in front of Stuart’s easel, eager to have their portrait painted by him. “He was, in effect, the unofficial painter to the new nation,” the Museum of Fine Arts Boston notes on its website. His widely copied and circulated Washington images are in our minds’ eye and often in our pockets, on every dollar bill.

Would you like to see other kinds of arts and culture articles? Please email us your story ideas or feedback at [email protected]
Lorraine Ferrier
Lorraine Ferrier
Author
Lorraine Ferrier writes about fine arts and craftsmanship for The Epoch Times. She focuses on artists and artisans, primarily in North America and Europe, who imbue their works with beauty and traditional values. She's especially interested in giving a voice to the rare and lesser-known arts and crafts, in the hope that we can preserve our traditional art heritage. She lives and writes in a London suburb, in England.
Related Topics