No two women of pre-Christian antiquity have been as celebrated for their beauty and chastity as the Hebrew Susanna and the Roman Lucretia. Both women are famous for their responses to being forced to choose between adultery or death and disgrace.
For millennia, the women have been depicted in art. But there is a paradox: Artists rarely emphasized the women’s moral qualities until Paolo Veronese (1528 –1588). While some artists took visual liberties with the narrative, Veronese chose to depict the women as the stories intended—virtuous women falsely accused of adultery.

The Stories of Susanna and Lucretia
Recounted in the Book of Daniel (Chapter 13), a pair of respected judges threatened to falsely swear that they saw Susanna committing adultery—guaranteeing a death sentence—unless she commit adultery with them. She refused, was put on trial, and condemned. Before she was taken away to be stoned, the prophet Daniel demanded that her accusers be cross-examined. Thanks to discrepancies in their accounts, the elder judges were proven guilty of perjury and executed.Common Artistic Interpretations
Artistic depictions of Susanna and Lucretia tend to be nude or partial nude paintings that focus on the scene where they were first threatened by their pursuers.More commonly, the judges play an important narrative role in a painter’s composition—but they are secondary to Susanna’s nudity. By Veronese’s day, the latter was already an artistic convention. Tintoretto, Alessandro Allori (an associate of Vasari), Lorenzo Lotti, and Jan Matsys all painted such scenes before Veronese.
Veronese’s Compositions
Veronese was the first great master to paint Lucretia and Susanna in ways focused on the virtues that made them prominent in the Western world’s moral imagination. To some extent, Veronese’s “Lucretia” may have been influenced by a circa 1515 painting commonly thought to be an early work of Titian. Each portrays Lucretia more or less fully covered in a mix of green and white, and with blonde hair. The earlier work remains focused on physical beauty, though more modestly. Lucretia’s eyes gaze upwards with a look that could be curious and her semi-transparent clothing indicates her physical shape. The dagger is angled slightly away from her.
Despite the similarities, Veronese reversed much of that painting. His Lucretia looks to the ground in shame and repentance—perhaps even self-loathing. Not only is she more covered, she is pulling up a cloak to cover herself more fully. The tip of her dagger is up against her chest—and might well have begun to penetrate it. In addition to killing her, it will pin the cloak against her to preserve her modesty even in death. Beautiful as she may be, the focus is on her act of suicide and the moral qualities that led her to take her own life.

Veronese’s depiction of Susanna displays a similar modesty. While more of her body than of Lucretia’s is visible, it indicates that she’s covering herself as rapidly as possible when the judges confront her. But her personality is different. Seen close up, her facial expression mixes incredulity and confusion with defiance—as though she considers their proposal too absurd to be credible.

Both documented stories emphasize the repercussions that arise from lust, highlighting the unchecked corruption and abuse of power by men of authority. Focusing on the women’s stories and their moral compass, Veronese inspired later generations of artists: Post-Renaissance masters including Rubens, Anthony van Dyck and Artemesia Gentileschi maintained the dominance of Veronese’s tradition.