I leant upon a coppice gate When Frost was spectre-grey, And Winter’s dregs made desolate The weakening eye of day. The tangled bine-stems scored the sky Like strings of broken lyres, And all mankind that haunted nigh Had sought their household fires.
The land’s sharp features seemed to be The Century’s corpse outleant, His crypt the cloudy canopy, The wind his death-lament. The ancient pulse of germ and birth Was shrunken hard and dry, And every spirit upon earth Seemed fervourless as I.
At once a voice arose among The bleak twigs overhead In a full-hearted evensong Of joy illimited; An aged thrush, frail, gaunt, and small, In blast-beruffled plume, Had chosen thus to fling his soul Upon the growing gloom.
So little cause for carolings Of such ecstatic sound Was written on terrestrial things Afar or nigh around, That I could think there trembled through His happy good-night air Some blessed Hope, whereof he knew And I was unaware.
Novelist and poet Thomas Hardy published this ode in 1900 as a reflection upon the turn of the century. Wrapped in solitude and scraped by the wind’s talons, the poem’s speaker looks out on winter’s lonesome desolation and seems to see in it a metaphor for the decline of the century, the decline of poetry, and perhaps the decline of civilization itself.But an unexpected turn halfway through the poem introduces a note of hope.
A Bleak Outlook
The poem is marked by endings: the end of the day, the end of the year, and the end of the century. It is perhaps for this reason that the opening stanzas contain so much imagery relating to death, aging, and decay. The “spectre-grey” of the frost suggests aging human hair, all wintry white. When Hardy referred to the absence of other human spectators to the bleak winter scene, he doesn’t speak of those who “live nigh”—the more natural word-choice—but rather those who “haunted nigh.” This phrasing suggests that the human inhabitants of that barren place are themselves in some sense already dead, like the past century, spirits wafting through a landscape as barren as the moon.Continuing the corpse metaphor, Hardy compares the slate-colored sky to the Century’s crypt and the wind to its funeral song. Any germ of fertility the earth might possess is “shrunken hard and dry,” invisible and completely inaccessible. Rebirth seems all but impossible.
Why such a pessimistic view of the close of the century? In this poem, Hardy joined a poetic tradition that included Matthew Arnold and T.S. Eliot. The tradition lamented many of the changes in the modern world, even as it rejected some aspects of the past. The increasing speed of technological change combined with philosophical skepticism had rewritten the world in profound ways during the 19th century.
Tearle wrote, “Hardy seems to subject the Victorian age to sharp scrutiny, analysing its developments and discoveries in an indirect but suggestive way. ... Because of such scientific and philosophical developments and discoveries in the nineteenth century, religious faith had declined among the overall population. ... A writer like Hardy could no longer take solace from Christianity, or have unequivocal confidence in the future of the world.”
Before Arnold, romantic poet John Keats used the word “darkling” in his reflection on art and mortality in “Ode to a Nightingale,” deriving the term, in turn, from Milton. Hardy thus linked his ode to Keats’s, too—and not just through that all-important word, but also by writing about a symbolic bird and its song, partly as a way to explore the nature of poetic inspiration.
The Valuation of Hope
This reading of the bird’s symbolism becomes even more powerful when we consider that poetry as a dominant art form had been in decline for several centuries by the time Hardy published. It may be that he considered himself a last “blast-beruffled” bard, pouring out a final poetic song before the total demise of poetry in the wintry landscape of modernity.Because Hardy’s writing is often pessimistic, the poem’s hopeful turn of the poem—when the bird begins to sing—is all the more interesting and inspiring. It’s interesting to note, too, that Hardy changed the title of the poem from “By the Century’s Deathbed” to “The Darkling Thrush,” thus emphasizing the hopeful aspects of the poem.”
Taking into account everything Hardy builds up in the first stanzas—the bleak landscape, the deathly imagery, the references to Matthew Arnold and declining faith, the pessimism surrounding the 19th century, the failure of poetry, and fears over humanity’s future, the appearance of the thrush and his “joy illimited” becomes all the more striking and inspirational.
Everything shifts in stanza three, too, when “A voice arose among/ The bleak twigs overhead.” This shift reminds readers of the “turn” or “volta” in a Shakespearean sonnet. The turn occurs when Shakespeare suddenly moves in a positive or hopeful direction after a stretch of morose musings.
In addition to symbolically connecting the bird to the poet himself, the thrush’s description in the penultimate stanza as “aged,” “frail, gaunt, and small,” and “blast-beruffled” suggests the fragility of hope and beauty in a harsh world. But that shouldn’t surprise us. Indeed, hope, by definition, exists concurrently with apparent doom. It lives in the face of, in defiance of, despair, and it means the most when there is good reason to despair.
In Hardy’s poem, the bird’s vulnerability makes its “full-hearted” song all the more powerful and moving. The poetic paradox is this: The bird is tiny, fragile, about to be blown away by the lamenting wind, yet somehow, at the same time, the bird and its song are stronger than all the darkness and the bitter cold.
In the poet’s words, the thrush sings “a full-hearted evensong,” a term referring to a liturgical evening prayer. Hardy also refers to the song as “carolings” and references “ecstasy.” This word-choice gives the bird a hint of religious significance, despite the fact that Hardy had lost his Christian faith long before writing the poem.
Is the “blessed Hope, whereof he knew/ And I was unaware” a religious hope, or something else? The answer is ambiguous. Hardy likely doesn’t know either—after all, he’s “unaware” of exactly what the Hope is. Yet with his poetic intuition, he senses the hope in a literal and metaphorical half-light—a movement, a stirring, a song. Perhaps things aren’t as bleak as they appear.
Mambrol wrote, “But we can see that the grimness of the poem is Hardy’s and not the world’s. The logic of the poem is to some extent self-refuting. It goes like this: Why should I not be bleak when the world around me is so demonstrably unvaried in its grimness? How can the thrush sing in such circumstances? But the thrush is one of the circumstances, and therefore it contradicts the argument that the world is one of unvarying grimness.”
The thrush is proof that the beauty, goodness, and miraculous life of the world is not yet spent. There is one piece of the puzzle that does not fit with Hardy’s own dismal autopsy of the past century and dismal predictions about the future: the bird, and its song. And Hardy is an honest enough poet to admit it.