‘Cotopaxi’: Forging National Identity in Frederic Church’s Painting

Amidst the chaos of the Civil War, Frederic Church’s “Cotopaxi” was interpreted as an allegory for the triumph of good over evil.
‘Cotopaxi’: Forging National Identity in Frederic Church’s Painting
"Cotopaxi," 1862, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 48 inches by 85 inches. Detroit Institute of Arts. Public Domain
Updated:
0:00

Five years after his second trip to Ecuador, American landscape painter Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900) painted the volcano erupting at sunrise. As the sublime, romantic composition unfurls in front of us, our eyes are first drawn toward the fiery sun, which dramatically reflects off the river at middle ground. Surrounded by thick, gray smoke emitted from the volcano, the incandescent orb pierces the cloud of dense ash, casting a soft, warm glow on the landscape.

The rugged cliffs in the foreground are mostly still in pre-dawn shadow, but the crags blush as they catch the morning light. A roaring waterfall, white with froth, is partially tinted a rosy hue from the rising sun. As with many of Church’s paintings, a copse of trees with a pastoral scene at the left foreground is executed with careful attention to detail. Each leaf and branch is considered. As the landscape recedes into the distance, the resolution of the painting fades, becoming increasingly atmospheric.

A detail of the pastoral landscape from "Cotopaxi," 1862, by Frederic Edwin Church. (Public Domain)
A detail of the pastoral landscape from "Cotopaxi," 1862, by Frederic Edwin Church. Public Domain

Although Church’s painting depicts an erupting volcano in Ecuador, it resonated with Americans. Amidst the chaos of the Civil War (1861–1865), the painting came to be interpreted as an allegory for good’s triumph over evil.

Painters, writers, and poets metaphorically used extreme weather or natural disasters to express the emotional turmoil of war and societal upheaval. During its 1863 exhibition in New York City, “Cotopaxi” was highly acclaimed. The American press, associating volcanoes to bombs and ash clouds to cannon smoke, claimed Church’s painting expressed “pillars of warning rather than of guidance.”

Nineteenth-century landscape painters were concerned with man’s destruction of nature’s untamed wilderness. The Eden they sought to capture on their canvas was commonly threatened by war, expansion, and industry. Like the volcano that reshapes its landscape, the Civil War was reshaping the American awareness.

The School of Nature

"Cotopaxi," 1862, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 48 inches by 85 inches. Detroit Institute of Arts. (Public Domain)
"Cotopaxi," 1862, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 48 inches by 85 inches. Detroit Institute of Arts. Public Domain

Church was born in Hartford, Connecticut, into a family of means. That enabled him to pursue his fascination with art at a young age. From age 18 to 20, Church studied with landscape painter Thomas Cole in the Catskill Mountains, absorbing Cole’s process of creating sketches directly from life, then returning to the studio to design and develop an idealized final composition. Cole is thought to be the founder of the Hudson River School, a group of 19th-century American landscape painters.

Church was fascinated by the volcanoes of the Andes during his first trip to South America in 1853. Upon returning to the continent four years later with artist Louis Rémy Mignot, Church was prolific in his creation of oil and pencil sketches of the volcanoes Cotopaxi, Sangay, and Chimborazo.

In the five years between Church’s second visit to Ecuador and the creation of “Cotopaxi” in 1862, the landscape painter created “Niagara” (1857), “The Heart of the Andes” (1859), and “Twilight in the Wilderness” (1860). He internalized composition and color lessons from each of these grand landscapes.

“Niagara,” 1857, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 40 inches by 90 1/2 inches. National Gallery of Art, Washington. (Public Domain)
“Niagara,” 1857, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 40 inches by 90 1/2 inches. National Gallery of Art, Washington. Public Domain
“The Heart of the Andes,” 1859, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 66 1/8 inches by 120 3/16 inches. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City. (Public Domain)
“The Heart of the Andes,” 1859, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 66 1/8 inches by 120 3/16 inches. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City. Public Domain
"Twilight in the Wilderness," 1860, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 40 inches by 64 inches. The Cleveland Museum of Art. (Public Domain)
"Twilight in the Wilderness," 1860, by Frederic Edwin Church. Oil on canvas; 40 inches by 64 inches. The Cleveland Museum of Art. Public Domain

Elements from each of these paintings—Niagara’s turbulent waterfall, Mount Chimborazo fading into the backdrop of the Andes, and the smoldering, orange altocumulus clouds in the wilderness—are integrated in “Cotopaxi.” The canvas can be viewed as a culminating composite of outdoor life sketches and lessons learned from the large-scale, finished paintings.

“Cotopaxi” was commissioned by philanthropist James Lenox, who already owned paintings by English painter J. M. W. Turner. Turner painted with far more loose and expressive brushwork than the Hudson River School painters. Church’s work paid homage to imaginative and compositional elements of Turner’s paintings—notably “The Fighting Temeraire” (1838), which was highly praised at its 1839 Royal Academy exhibition.

"The Fighting Temeraire," 1839, by Joseph Mallord William Turner. Oil on canvas; 35 3/4 inches by 47 4/5 inches. National Gallery, London. (Public Domain)
"The Fighting Temeraire," 1839, by Joseph Mallord William Turner. Oil on canvas; 35 3/4 inches by 47 4/5 inches. National Gallery, London. Public Domain

“Cotopaxi” is more than a faithful rendering of the South American landscape brought to life by a highly skilled painter. Rather, it’s a testament to Church’s compositional virtuosity, his captivation with the writing of naturalist Alexander von Humboldt and art critic John Ruskin, and the turmoil of the Civil War. Viewers interpreted the painting as an allegory of the dawn of the good amid the war raging in the American South.

To see other kinds of arts and culture articles, please email ideas or feedback to [email protected] 
Mari Otsu
Mari Otsu
Author
Mari Otsu has a BA in art history and psychology and learned classical drawing and oil painting in Grand Central Atelier's core program.