But is this a paradox? Arguably, the power of this music derives from having been written by supremely talented, well-trained composers who just happened to live in a Christian tradition, writing mainly for the church. If the dominant religion over the past millennium had been atheist secularism, say, talented composers might still have written equally compelling music.
The same might also be true elsewhere in the arts—not just for Christian composers such as Mozart, but also for Christian poets like Dante, and Christian artists like Beato Angelico. If so, the power of Mozart’s famous Ave Verum has nothing to do with the mystical body of Christ in the Eucharist and everything to do with the innate genius of the composer.
A problem with such counterfactual hypotheses, however, is that this is all they are: hypotheses. By contrast, sacred music and extraordinary Christian art is a reality. Many of these Christian artists also experienced their own creative process as “inspired,” believing God had had a hand in their work.
The God Exclusion
Classical composers in the post-war period sought to make a clear break with tradition, including with the cultural baggage of Christianity. The Scottish composer James MacMillan, who is also a professor at the University of St. Andrews divinity school, lamented the divorce of music from extramusical inspiration in this period:“Composers like Boulez, Stockhausen, Berio, and the young Turks of the post-war generation wanted to start afresh from year zero, to write a music that was untainted by tradition.”
British music departments and conservatoires of MacMillan’s generation in the 1970s saw music as “complete in itself” and that “anything else was extraneous and irrelevant.”
“I left music college swearing never to write another note again. … It was during the mid-1980s when esoteric and cerebral avant-garde music was still considered the right kind of music to be writing.”
Classical music in this era became ultimately sterile, delighted with its own inaccessibility and unpopularity: a cerebral playing around with notes on the page. MacMillan and Panufnik only discovered their own compositional voices by being true to themselves, allowing the “spiritual dimension to emerge” and reacting against the culture of the time.
Today, if you go to a concert even of sacred music, you are unlikely to find reference in the program notes to religious inspiration. There remains a snooty condescension in intellectual circles toward the “extramusical,” and a privileging of pure musical analysis.
Our response at St. Andrews has been to try to introduce the next generation of composers to the creative power of Christianity, pioneering what we call theologically informed programming and performance. We paired six of the best upcoming composers from around the UK and Ireland with doctoral theologians from the university.
When music encounters religion, I see the result as being like the scriptural image of water and wine: The art can be transformed and come not to serve theology, but to be theology—or more exactly theoartistry, insofar as it may reveal God in a new way through artistry.
From the earliest Gregorian chants, through Bach and Mozart, to the very different contemporary sacred music of MacMillan and Arvo Pärt, there are so many examples of the great beauty that this can achieve.