When Charles Dickens died on June 9, 1870, newspapers on both sides of the Atlantic framed his loss as an event of national and international mourning. They pointed to the fictional characters Dickens had created as a key part of his artistic legacy, writing how “we have laughed with Sam Weller, with Mrs. Nickleby, with Sairey Gamp, with Micawber.” Dickens himself had already featured as the subject of one piece of short biographical fiction published during his lifetime. Yet, in the years following his death, he would be increasingly appropriated as a fictional character by the Victorians, both in published texts and in privately circulated fan works.
Will the real Dickens stand up? Daguerreotype portrait of Charles Dickens, 1852, by Antoine Claudet. Library Company of Philadelphia. Public Domain
Dickens’s private family funeral at Westminster Abbey created a gap in knowledge that some journalists chose to fill with a fictional scene they considered more emotionally satisfying. The London Penny Illustrated Paper visually reimagined the funeral, publishing a large illustration depicting a crowded public event.
Under the subheading “A National Honor Due to Charles Dickens,” the accompanying text acknowledges that the image is fictional, but argues that:
“A ceremony such as is depicted in our Engraving would unquestionably have best represented the national feeling of mourning occasioned by the lamented death.”
The grave of Charles Dickens in Westminster Abbey. While Dickens had a private funeral, journalists reimagined it as a grand affair. CC0
It was the publication of John Forster’s “Life of Charles Dickens” in 1872–74, though, that marked a watershed in fictionalizations of Dickens. Victorian readers now had a full-length birth-to-death Dickens biography to draw on, written by a friend who had known him for his entire adulthood. Dickens’s Preface to his 1849–50 novel “David Copperfield” had encouraged readers to interpret it as semi-autobiographical. However, it was only with Forster’s biography that the full extent of the similarities between Dickens and the fictional Copperfield was made public.
An illustration of the characters Mr. Micawber and David Copperfield from Charles Dickens’s “David Copperfield,” considered the author’s most autobiographical novel. Hulton Archive/Getty Images
The revelation that Dickens had performed child labor in a blacking warehouse when his father was imprisoned for debt, before rising to international fame in his 20s, gave him a life story that the press described as rivaling Dickens’s “most popular novel.”
Rags to Riches
The Household Edition of Forster’s “Life,” published by Chapman & Hall in 1879, included 28 new illustrations of the biography by Fred Barnard. Among them was an emotive image of Dickens as a young boy in the blacking warehouse.
Illustration by Fred Barnard of young Charles Dickens at work in a shoe-blacking factory after his father had been sent to a workhouse. In the 1892 edition of Forster's “Life of Dickens.” Public Domain
Dickens wrote a private account of this time, for which Forster’s biography is our only remaining source. In this autobiographical fragment, Dickens describes how he was brought down to work among other boys in the warehouse. He was careful not to let them see his suffering, and to make sure that he worked as hard as them. Yet what Barnard pictures is a scene of solitude, visible despair or perhaps exhaustion at the warehouse that is not described in this fragment. The image bears a closer resemblance to Dickens’s fictionalization of the first day at the warehouse in “David Copperfield.”
In the novel, the young Copperfield writes: “I mingled my tears with the water in which I was washing the [blacking] bottles.” Barnard heightens and externalizes the private emotion that Dickens wrote about in the autobiographical fragment to create a fictional scene. In doing so, he further blurs the boundaries between Dickens and the fictional Copperfield.
The practice of Grangerization—the art of extending and customizing a published book with inserted material—was popular among Victorian readers. Additional fictionalized illustrations of Dickens’s life, created by the Dickens illustrator Frederick W. Pailthorpe, are revealed in a 14-volume Grangerization of Forster’s “Life,” held in the British Library.
Some of these seem to have been created for personal interest and private circulation among fellow Dickens enthusiasts, rather than for publication. One sketch shows Dickens as a boy making a low bow to a friend of his father’s.
This image is based on an incident that Forster describes as taking place at the blacking warehouse where Dickens worked. Yet Pailthorpe’s illustration fictionalizes the location of the event, transposing the young Dickens to the front of the house of John Dryden, the former poet laureate next to whom Dickens would eventually be buried in Westminster Abbey. In doing so, Pailthorpe creates a narrative in which Dickens was always destined for literary greatness.
Biographical Fiction and ‘Real-Person Fiction’
In the 21st century, readers have commented on the resemblances between the fictional stories that the young Brontë siblings wrote about real-life contemporary figures such as the Duke of Wellington, and 20th- and 21st-century forms of fan fiction. Oscar Wilde’s 1889 story “The Portrait of Mr W.H.“ focuses on a series of men whose biographical speculations about the life of Shakespeare verge on fictionalization.Nevertheless, recent scholarly work on biographical fiction has described it as coming into being “mainly in the 20th century.” Press articles on the form of fan fiction known as “real-person fiction” have largely focused on it as a product of internet culture (while noting briefly that many of Shakespeare’s plays also fictionalize real-life figures).
“Dickens's Dream” by Robert William Buss, portraying Dickens at his desk surrounded by many of his characters. Public Domain
Archival work on the Victorian press, and on semi-private forms of reader response such as Grangerized books, can flesh out our understanding of the role that biographical fictionalization played in Victorian culture. It demonstrates a longer and more varied history of the human desire to appropriate and imaginatively re-create famous contemporary figures. And it shows that part of Dickens’s creative legacy, as well as his own works, was the fictional forms that his life inspired others to create.
Lucy Whitehead is a doctoral candidate researcher in the school of English, Communication, and Philosophy at Cardiff University in the U.K. This article was first published on The Conversation.
