I have long admired the writing and fastidious research of historian David Pietrusza, but “Roosevelt Sweeps Nation: FDR’s 1936 Landslide and the Triumph of the Liberal Ideal” is his magnum opus, at least to date.
Much more so than other Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) biographies, Pietrusza’s incredible inquiries and presentations of dialogue from the mid-1930s bring readers into America’s salons and streets, White House corridors and quarters, and Roosevelt’s homes in New York City and in the Hudson Valley to the north. One truly gets a sense of the epoch and also of the ebbs and flows of the 1936 presidential campaign.
Uniting a Diverse Camp
Somehow, FDR managed to keep liberals and leftists on board his campaign while corralling Deep South segregationists in his camp as well. Pietrusza provides windows into the views of racist characters like Louisiana U.S. Senator Huey Long, and the anti-Semitic attitudes of national radio preacher Father Charles Coughlin, among others.The incumbent vice president, John Nance Garner, of Uvalde, Texas, was FDR’s running mate again. He had been speaker of the House prior to his 1933 inauguration as veep. As a state legislator, Garner had voted to install a “poll tax,” widely seen as discouraging suffrage among African Americans.
Overturning the Odds
Kansas Governor Landon emerged to be a lackluster campaigner as the Republicans’ nominee. A “progressive” Republican, Landon favored many New Deal initiatives but suggested that he could rid them of waste and inefficiency. A less-than-inspiring speaker, he was slow in joining the campaign trail. Pietrusza observed: “Had Leni Riefenstall filmed this (Alf Landon) rally, she would have titled her production ‘Triumph of the Dull.’”In contrast, though mostly confined to a wheelchair, FDR crisscrossed the nation en route to his 46-state, 523-to-8 Electoral College landslide victory. Ultimately, Franklin Roosevelt garnered 61% of the popular vote versus Landon’s 37%, with 2% going to independent William Lemke, the North Dakota Congressman.
Pietrusza elucidates an electoral shift underway, with black voters swinging from Republicans to supporting Roosevelt and his New Deal. Still, being a visible supporter of the GOP was accepted in the black community. Olympic gold medalist Jesse Owens, an African American icon based on his summer track victories in Berlin, openly campaigned for Alf Landon. FDR countered with future heavyweight champ Joe Louis.
The First Modern Campaign
There are numerous parallels between the 1936 presidential campaign and those conducted in the 21st century, Pietrusza catalogs. The familiar modern tactic of waging “class warfare,” pitting lower- and middle-income people against the more prosperous, was honed successfully by FDR. Perhaps the publicity garnered by socialist, communist, and radical populist campaigns (such as Huey Long’s “Share Our Wealth” scheme and Francis Townsend’s fiscally untenable old-age pension plan) in 1935 and ‘36 influenced the president to shore up his left flank, mouthing a softer version of Marxist “critical theory.”The national media of the 1930s never focused on FDR’s reliance on wheelchairs, braces, and crutches, concentrating on his irrepressible smile and his confident speechmaking. There was no coverage of the president’s omnipresent female assistants.
This sprawling, colorful depiction of Franklin Roosevelt’s first reelection drive presents the initial real campaign of the modern age. With the rapid penetration of radio into most homes, the medium was a gift for a president to showcase his oratory, reassuring nervous Americans, often with real-world analogies.
The impending power of television may be fodder for David Pietrusza’s future books on presidential campaigns.