What is the origin of things? Did things come from nothing or from something? Those were just some of the many questions the ancient Greeks pondered, but it led them to be the first to truly innovate. They saw what was and made it better.
Armand D’Angour, professor of classics and a fellow at Jesus College at the University of Oxford, has translated portions of several ancient Greek works, adding his introductions to certain ideas, as part of Princeton University Press’s collection of Ancient Wisdom for Modern Readers.
D’Angour starts his book off with a quote from Democritus: “Thinking new thoughts every day.” Truly, the ancient Greeks knew how to think, and the author of this short translation of selected works makes that very clear to the reader.
It’s always prudent to give any innovator credit when credit is due, and the Greeks deserve much of the credit for pushing civilization to be more thoughtful and more innovative.
The author points out that the ancient Greeks invented the alphabet. They borrowed and adapted letterforms used by the Phoenicians, and the Greek alphabet, in turn, was adapted by the Romans. From there, the Roman language spread as the Romans did.
He adds that the Greeks invented “philosophy, logic, rhetoric, and mathematical proof”; they were the “first practitioners of theatrical drama, rational medicine, monetary coinage, and lifelike sculpture”; and they created “competitive athletics, architectural canons, the self-governing city-state, and democratic politics.”
The Source of Innovation
As aforementioned, the book begins with the ancient Greeks discussing the source of change. How do things come to be and how do they become better? Their desire to know the origin of change and their belief that something always comes from something was the engine of their innovative spirit.The Source of Each Story
The author provides the source of each story of innovation with an introduction. Instead of conducting a complete translation of the work, like Plato’s “Republic” or Aristotle’s “Politics,” which are large works on their own, he provides a brief overview of the ideas within the following chapter.Innovative Thinking
The innovative mind is the central theme. We start with the brilliant mind of Archimedes when he is presented with a task to find out if the king’s crown is made of pure gold or not, without chipping it or melting it down. His “Eureka” moment comes in his bathtub, which iterates the author’s point that “certain conditions can help to stimulate the spark of innovative thought.”The author discusses how this moment in the tub caused Archimedes to consider the object’s density through water displacement. This idea of density and floatation leads right into the building of the massive ship “Syracusia,” which Archimedes proved could float, despite its size, well before it hit the water.
Plato was Aristotle’s teacher, but the student had little issue with dismantling some of Plato’s, or Socrates’s ideas on politics and government. The author shows that it doesn’t always take a mathematical genius (though these philosophers were) to be innovative.
In the realm of politics, it comes down to asking the right questions. Aristotle breaks down politics in the same way he breaks down the categories of state, family, and the individual. This path to understanding politics made it easier to understand the role of government and make it better.
D’Angour also translates Aristotle’s thoughts on laws and why people break them. This line of thought allowed him to discuss openly why some laws are bad, some good, and some unnecessary.
Aristotle wrote, “written laws should not be considered unalterable.” This statement allowed for open discussion into changing laws that proved unnecessary or unhelpful. By enabling open discussion, laws and governments were able to undergo beneficial innovations.
In this final section of the book, the author also extends the thoughts and actions of the ancient Greeks to their disdain for abuse via innovation, or simply put, innovation for innovation’s sake. This abuse is centered around law and government.
Aristotle finalizes the book with a powerful line: “The law has now power to secure obedience other than the power of habit, which needs time to take effect, so that readiness to change from old to new laws weakens the power of the law.”
Though most of this section is centered on law and government, the abuse of innovation extends to everything. This last line from the book clarifies that innovating for the sake of innovating can actually diminish, if not destroy, the very thing from which it originated.
These works from Princeton University Press’s “Ancient Wisdom for Modern Readers” are necessary for a society that seems to have abandoned its origins.
In particular, this book on innovation will create a new appreciation for the ancient Greeks and all those who came before us. It can also act as a source of inspiration to either go innovate or ponder what might need innovating.
