‘Beyond Brilliance': Highlights From MFA Boston’s Jewelry Collection

After four years of planning, MFA Boston’s recently renovated jewelry gallery is one of the most expansive collections in the world.
‘Beyond Brilliance': Highlights From MFA Boston’s Jewelry Collection
Forever Dancing ‑ Bright Star butterfly brooch, 2013, by Wallace Chan. Yellow diamond, fancy colored diamonds, rock crystal, mother‑of‑pearl, butterfly specimen, pearl, and titanium. Gift of Christin Xing and Rex Wong. (Reproduced with permission/Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Updated:
0:00
At Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts, over 4,000 years of history are on display in the ongoing exhibition “Beyond Brilliance: Highlights from the Jewelry Collection.” Stories from the distant past and the present—of love, war, death, global trade, politics, science, and artistry—are told through over 150 objects shown in a recently renovated gallery.
The exhibit, which took four years to plan and implement, “showcases the MFA’s outstanding collection of jewelry, one of the most expansive in the world,” says Emily Stoehrer, the Museum’s jewelry curator. She is the United States’ sole museum curator dedicated to jewelry. This ongoing exhibit opened in May and includes annual rotations of certain objects.

The sparkling ornaments on view, many which have famous provenances, include surviving artifacts from ancient civilizations, 19th-century jewels inspired by history and foreign lands, innovative 20th-century designs, costume jewelry, and contemporary jewelry that combines traditional subjects with the latest materials.

"Beyond Brilliance: Jewelry Highlights From the Collection" installation at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation Gallery. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
"Beyond Brilliance: Jewelry Highlights From the Collection" installation at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation Gallery. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

Ancient and Modern Jewels

Jewelry is the world’s oldest art form. The earliest examples of adornment, a universal human inclination, date back over 100,000 years. Beads played a prominent role. While this exhibition is organized thematically, it begins with the oldest piece—the beaded ancient Egyptian Wesekh broadcollar from 2246 to 2152 B.C.
Wesekh broadcollar, 2246–2152 B.C. Gold, steatite, turquoise, and lapis lazuli. Harvard University—Boston Museum of Fine Arts Expedition. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Wesekh broadcollar, 2246–2152 B.C. Gold, steatite, turquoise, and lapis lazuli. Harvard University—Boston Museum of Fine Arts Expedition. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

The collar’s components are gold, rare turquoise (potentially mined in the Sinai Peninsula), costly lapis lazuli (likely from Afghanistan), and steatite (a metamorphic rock). The outer gold row features pieces fashioned in the form of scarab beetles. They were important cultural symbols of rebirth, protection, and luck. The dead were often buried with items featuring beetles. This broadcollar was excavated from the tomb of a court official, whose name is inscribed on the gold terminals.

The Museum has incorporated digital components to enhance the viewing experience. Videos show both the front and back of some objects, and an in-depth audio tour is  downloadable online. While the exhibit features a number of large pieces, the ancient Greek earring from about 350 to 325 B.C, which depicts Nike driving a two-horse chariot, is among the smallest, most exquisite jewels on display. Scholars believe the earring may have been worn by a royal or used to decorate a statue, given the astonishing craftsmanship.
Earring with Nike driving a two‑horse chariot, circa 350–325 B.C. Gold and enamel. Henry Lillie Pierce Fund. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Earring with Nike driving a two‑horse chariot, circa 350–325 B.C. Gold and enamel. Henry Lillie Pierce Fund. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

The piece depicts the goddess of victory, Nike, and consists of over 100 parts soldered together. Nike wears a “chiton,” a belted tunic, and is portrayed with a focused expression as she holds the reins of rearing horses. Her wings convey movement and are finely chased. Above this vignette is a tear-shaped fruit at the center of a honeysuckle palmette.

The MFA has a particularly rich 19th- and 20th-century jewelry collection. A piece with royal connections is the Coburg Eagle brooch from 1840. This sentimental brooch was one of 12 designed by Prince Consort Albert as a gift from Queen Victoria to the train-bearers at their wedding. It’s the first piece to be acquired by an American museum. Royal bridesmaids traditionally received a dove-themed gift. In this instance, the eagle was an appropriate symbol of Albert’s German family, the House of Coburg. The materials used are symbolic of the occasion: turquoise for forget-me-nots, diamonds expressing eternity, rubies representing passion, and pearls signifying true love.

Coburg Eagle brooch designed by Prince Consort Albert, 1840. Gold, turquoise, pearl, ruby, and diamond. Museum purchase with funds donated by the Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Coburg Eagle brooch designed by Prince Consort Albert, 1840. Gold, turquoise, pearl, ruby, and diamond. Museum purchase with funds donated by the Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

A contemporary German design in the exhibition is Hemmerle’s large pair of tassel earrings from 2018. They were made for the firm’s 125th anniversary. Containing over 200 carats of sapphires, the beaded tassels are suspended from an iron Bavarian crown, a nod to the firm’s Munich heritage.

Pair of tassel earrings and mold, 2018, by Hemmerle. Black finished iron, white gold, sapphires, and sapphire tassels. Gift of Hemmerle with the generous assistance of Christian and Yasmin Hemmerle (Copyright Hemmerle/Courtesy of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)<br/><br/>
Pair of tassel earrings and mold, 2018, by Hemmerle. Black finished iron, white gold, sapphires, and sapphire tassels. Gift of Hemmerle with the generous assistance of Christian and Yasmin Hemmerle (Copyright Hemmerle/Courtesy of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

Revivalist Jewelry

Historical revivalist jewelry was prominent in the 19th century. Contemporaneous excavations of ancient sites inspired the Archeological Revival movement. The Italian firm Castellani is considered one of the greatest jewelers of this style. The goldsmith family business specialized in micromosaics, which are assembled from tesserae, tiny fragments of glass. An example in the exhibit is a lion brooch from about 1870. The soulful lion head may have been inspired by Pompeiian floor mosaics, a then-recent discovery. Lions were symbols of strength and bravery in ancient Rome.
Micromosaic lion brooch, circa 1870, by Castellani. Gold and glass. Gift of Susan Beth Kaplan. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Micromosaic lion brooch, circa 1870, by Castellani. Gold and glass. Gift of Susan Beth Kaplan. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

The Renaissance revival was another popular movement in this period. The exhibit’s Jewish marriage ring was made in Central Europe during the 19th century, but in a 16th-century style. Jewish wedding rings are traditionally simple bands, but elaborate examples were sometimes used during the ceremony. These architectural rings are in the form of the Temple of Jerusalem. In the MFA’s version, the roof opens. While it lacks gemstones, it is superbly chased and enameled. The jewel’s maker was likely influenced by treasure hoards discovered in the 1800s.

Jewish marriage ring, 19th century. Gold and enamel. Anonymous Centennial gift. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Jewish marriage ring, 19th century. Gold and enamel. Anonymous Centennial gift. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

A classic high society jewel from the late 19th century is the exhibit’s natural pearl and diamond necklace hailing from the Rothschild family’s Austrian branch. The beautiful piece features 10 perfectly matched natural pearls—an astounding assemblage. These natural pearls were considered more precious than diamonds until, at the turn of the 20th century, people mastered the process of creating cultured pearls. This necklace was in the collection of Baroness Clarice de Rothschild.

Natural pearl and diamond necklace, circa 1880. Silver, gold, natural pearls (pinctada maxima), and diamonds. Gift of the heirs of Bettina Looram de Rothschild. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Natural pearl and diamond necklace, circa 1880. Silver, gold, natural pearls (pinctada maxima), and diamonds. Gift of the heirs of Bettina Looram de Rothschild. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

When the Nazis annexed Austria in 1938, the baroness was abroad in London, traveling with most of her jewelry collection; this necklace escaped Nazis plunder. The necklace is representative of the Belle Époque movement, specifically the era’s “garland” style, characterized by the swag design of drooping curved lines. The piece is set in silver-topped gold: Silver was considered more becoming for colorless diamonds to maintain a white-on-white effect. The gold backing was necessary so that the wearer’s skin or clothing would avoid tarnish. At the time this necklace was made, platinum was too difficult to handle to use as a jewelry setting. Scientific innovations eventually allowed this metal to replace the historic silver topped gold setting.

A patriotic example of platinum is an American flag brooch by Black, Starr and Frost, one of the United States’ oldest jewelry houses.

American Flag brooch for Black, Starr and Frost, 1917, possibly by Oscar Heyman Bros. Platinum, diamond, ruby, and sapphire. Gift of Selina F. Little in memory of Nina Fletcher Little. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
American Flag brooch for Black, Starr and Frost, 1917, possibly by Oscar Heyman Bros. Platinum, diamond, ruby, and sapphire. Gift of Selina F. Little in memory of Nina Fletcher Little. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

The most famous American jewelry brand, Tiffany & Co., is represented in the show. One of their pieces is an exotic hand ornament from around 1893. The company’s chief designer, G. Paulding Farnham, conceptualized it. He looked to an Indian hathpal, a traditional wedding ornament, for inspiration. Colorful semiprecious stones are set in gold that encircle the wrist, lay on the back of the hand, and go over four fingers. To help the viewer understand the piece’s complexity, it is displayed on a meticulously crafted model of a hand.

Hand Ornament, circa 1893, designed by G. Paulding Farnham. Gold, turquoise, sapphire, green garnet, zircon, peridot, hessonite garnet, beryl, tourmaline, chrysoberyl, and pearl. Gift of Jody Sataloff in memory of Joseph and Ruth Sataloff. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Hand Ornament, circa 1893, designed by G. Paulding Farnham. Gold, turquoise, sapphire, green garnet, zircon, peridot, hessonite garnet, beryl, tourmaline, chrysoberyl, and pearl. Gift of Jody Sataloff in memory of Joseph and Ruth Sataloff. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

Art Nouveau and Deco Designs

The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century were marked by two of the most celebrated jewelry movements: Art Nouveau and Art Deco. The Spanish pendant by Fuset y Grau showing a girl blowing pearl bubbles from circa 1910 is a delightful illustration of the former, marked by flowing lines, nature motifs, female figuration, and the use of pliqué-à-jour enamel. This enamel technique is backless and simulates the look of stained glass to stunning effect.
Girl Blowing Bubbles pendant, circa 1910, by Fuset y Grau. Gold, platinum, plique-a-jour enamel, pearl, ivory, and sapphire. Museum purchase with funds donated by Susan B. Kaplan, William Francis Warden Fund, Carol Noble in honor of Susan B. Kaplan, and anonymously. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Girl Blowing Bubbles pendant, circa 1910, by Fuset y Grau. Gold, platinum, plique-a-jour enamel, pearl, ivory, and sapphire. Museum purchase with funds donated by Susan B. Kaplan, William Francis Warden Fund, Carol Noble in honor of Susan B. Kaplan, and anonymously. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

Art Deco embraced bold, geometric shapes, novel cuts of stones, and new materials. A spectacular object presented by the MFA is the Marjorie Merriweather Post brooch from 1929, made by Oscar Heyman Bros. for Marcus & Co., an important American jeweler in New York. This au courant platinum brooch utilizes a historic object—a 17th-century 60-carat carved emerald. This emerald was mined in South America, traveled to Europe, was then taken by Portuguese ship to India, and finally carved with images of iris blossoms by a master craftsman. Emeralds are notoriously difficult to carve, and Indian artisans during the Mughal dynasty became expert in the art. Post assembled a historic jewelry collection, and this brooch was one of her prized pieces.

Marjorie Merriweather Post brooch, 1929, by Oscar Heyman Bros. Platinum, diamond, and emerald. William Francis Warden Fund, Marshall H. Gould Fund, Frank B. Bemis Fund, Mary S. and Edward J. Holmes Fund, John H. and Ernestine A. Payne Fund, Otis Norcross Fund, Helen and Alice Colburn Fund, William E. Nickerson Fund, Arthur Tracy Cabot Fund, Edwin E. Jack Fund, Frederick Brown Fund, Elizabeth Marie Paramino Fund in memory of John F. Paramino, Boston Sculptor, Morris and Louise Rosenthal Fund, Harriet Otis Cruft Fund, H.E. Bolles Fund, Seth K. Sweetser Fund, Helen B. Sweeney Fund, Ernest Kahn Fund, Arthur Mason Knapp Fund, John Wheelock Elliot and John Morse Elliot Fund, Susan Cornelia Warren Fund, Mary L. Smith Fund, Samuel Putnam Avery Fund, Alice M. Bartlett Fund, Benjamin Pierce Cheney Donation, Frank M. and Mary T. B. Ferrin Fund, and Joyce Arnold Rusoff Fund. (Reproduced with permission/Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Marjorie Merriweather Post brooch, 1929, by Oscar Heyman Bros. Platinum, diamond, and emerald. William Francis Warden Fund, Marshall H. Gould Fund, Frank B. Bemis Fund, Mary S. and Edward J. Holmes Fund, John H. and Ernestine A. Payne Fund, Otis Norcross Fund, Helen and Alice Colburn Fund, William E. Nickerson Fund, Arthur Tracy Cabot Fund, Edwin E. Jack Fund, Frederick Brown Fund, Elizabeth Marie Paramino Fund in memory of John F. Paramino, Boston Sculptor, Morris and Louise Rosenthal Fund, Harriet Otis Cruft Fund, H.E. Bolles Fund, Seth K. Sweetser Fund, Helen B. Sweeney Fund, Ernest Kahn Fund, Arthur Mason Knapp Fund, John Wheelock Elliot and John Morse Elliot Fund, Susan Cornelia Warren Fund, Mary L. Smith Fund, Samuel Putnam Avery Fund, Alice M. Bartlett Fund, Benjamin Pierce Cheney Donation, Frank M. and Mary T. B. Ferrin Fund, and Joyce Arnold Rusoff Fund. (Reproduced with permission/Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

Post’s former possession is presented next to a contemporary Indian brooch by BHAGAT. This jewel resembles a “jali,” an ornamental window screen found in a number of different types of buildings in the region. Emeralds were used to mimic the moss that grows on much of Mumbai’s architecture. The piece was made with Colombian emeralds and combines Mughal and Art Deco designs. It left the workshop in February 2024 and arrived at the MFA in April—making it the newest acquisition.

Jali brooch, 2024, by BHAGAT. Gold (18k), diamond, and emerald. William Francis Warden Fund. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Jali brooch, 2024, by BHAGAT. Gold (18k), diamond, and emerald. William Francis Warden Fund. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

A star of the show is Boivin’s starfish brooch from 1937, one of the most famous 20th-century jewels. Designed by an important French female designer Juliette Moutard, the brooch was owned by Hollywood actress Claudette Colbert. This large brooch is four inches long, and made of gold, 71 rubies, and 665 amethysts. It is believed that only four examples in this stone combination were made in the 1930s. The brooch is fully articulated, composed of joints that move and drape like a real marine creature. Despite the complicated construction, the resulting brooch appears seamlessly elegant.

Starfish brooch, 1937, by Juliette Moutard. 18‑karat gold, ruby, and amethyst. Museum purchase with funds donated by the Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation, Monica S. Sadler, Otis Norcross Fund, Helen and Alice Colburn Fund, the Curators Circle: Fashion Council, Nancy Adams and Scott Schoen, Seth K. Sweetser Fund, Theresa Baybutt, Emi M. and William G. Winterer, and Deborah Glasser. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Starfish brooch, 1937, by Juliette Moutard. 18‑karat gold, ruby, and amethyst. Museum purchase with funds donated by the Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation, Monica S. Sadler, Otis Norcross Fund, Helen and Alice Colburn Fund, the Curators Circle: Fashion Council, Nancy Adams and Scott Schoen, Seth K. Sweetser Fund, Theresa Baybutt, Emi M. and William G. Winterer, and Deborah Glasser. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

The natural world of fauna and flora has traditionally served as fertile inspiration for jewelry. There are a handful of flower and butterfly examples in the exhibit, including two contemporary pieces by Chinese jewelers, who renewed the form through their use of titanium settings. Luxury jewelers prefer the metal because it can be anodized to create a rich range of colors. In addition, its lightness facilitates the creation of large but wearable jewels.

Enchanted Ania Brooch, 2023, by Anna Hu. Spinels (8.48ct), round brilliant cut diamonds (5.36 ct), and titanium. Gift of Dr. Christina S. Yao. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Enchanted Ania Brooch, 2023, by Anna Hu. Spinels (8.48ct), round brilliant cut diamonds (5.36 ct), and titanium. Gift of Dr. Christina S. Yao. (Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

Wallace Chan’s magnificently sculptural Forever Dancing–Bright Star butterfly brooch is made of colored diamonds and real butterfly wing specimens. Chan is one of the most important jewelers today. The brooch is the first Chan work to enter an American museum collection. In Chinese culture, the butterfly is symbolic of eternal love and features in an historic Romeo and Juliet-esque legend called the Butterfly Lovers.

Forever Dancing ‑ Bright Star butterfly brooch, 2013, by Wallace Chan. Yellow diamond, fancy colored diamonds, rock crystal, mother‑of‑pearl, butterfly specimen, pearl, and titanium. Gift of Christin Xing and Rex Wong. (Reproduced with permission/Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)
Forever Dancing ‑ Bright Star butterfly brooch, 2013, by Wallace Chan. Yellow diamond, fancy colored diamonds, rock crystal, mother‑of‑pearl, butterfly specimen, pearl, and titanium. Gift of Christin Xing and Rex Wong. (Reproduced with permission/Copyright Museum of Fine Arts, Boston)

“Beyond Brilliance” celebrates the creativity and technical genius of the many people involved in the production of each jewel. It invites the viewer to be captivated by the beauty of the objects and the stories they tell, compellingly facilitated by the curation. The exhibit successfully makes the case that jewelry is art, belongs in museums, and is an educational delight.

The newly renovated gallery, “Beyond Brilliance: Highlights from the Jewelry Collection” is on ongoing exhibition at the MFA Boston. To find out more, visit mfa.org.
Would you like to see other kinds of arts and culture articles? Please email us your story ideas or feedback at [email protected] 
Michelle Plastrik is an art adviser living in New York City. She writes on a range of topics, including art history, the art market, museums, art fairs, and special exhibitions.