I grew up in a family with two older sisters and a mother who loved to watch miniseries based on classic novels. At the time, I grumbled and groaned about it because I would have preferred to watch war movies or dinosaur documentaries, but I was outnumbered and outgunned, and period dramas won the day (or evening). As a result, much of my TV experience as a child and youth was with romantic miniseries set in Regency or Victorian England. At 12, I had, somewhat against my will, far more fluency in Jane Austen than the average boy. Having an English teacher for a father enhanced the atmosphere of appreciation for these classic works and their film adaptations.
‘Pride and Prejudice’ (1995)
I think I hardly need to summarize this famous Regency-era story by Jane Austen. Its enduring, widespread appeal stems from its complex study of character and its depiction of a mutual distaste turned to love that, in the end, makes the lovers better people. It is young Eliza Bennet’s interactions with the moody Mr. Darcy that teach her the dangers of rash judgments, and it is Eliza’s rejection of Darcy that chastens his excessive pride. Lizzy and Darcy expose one another’s faults—first through anger, then through love. They end up teaching one another valuable lessons, and their relationship aids each of them in the growth of virtue. There’s not much more one could hope for from true love.I stand firm against the onslaughts of my students, who try to convince me that the 2005 film version of this classic tale of romance is better than the 1995 miniseries starring Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle. While I’m forced to give ground on the question of cinematography (the 2005 flick is beautifully shot and scored, while the 1995 series is merely serviceable in those regards), I insist that the 1995 version captures the spirit of the novel far better and features superior acting.
‘North & South’ (2004)
This series adapts Elizabeth Gaskell’s 1855 novel about the Industrial Revolution in England. It dramatizes the clash between two very different worlds when Margaret Hale (Daniela Denby-Ashe) and her parents move from the rural south of England to the urban, industrialized north, which is so different from what Hale knows that it might as well be another country. There, she witnesses the poverty and squalor that many of the cotton factory workers live in, as well as their preparations for a strike that threatens to turn violent and destabilize the entire system. On the other side of the divide, she comes to know the stern, withdrawn, yet intriguing factory owner Mr. Thornton (Richard Armitage) and his imperious mother (Sinéad Cusack). Hale’s and Thornton’s temperaments and worldviews immediately collide.With a darker mood than most of the series on this list, “North & South” doesn’t shy away from depicting poverty, loss, and even violence. But all this makes the moments of light, humanity, and gentle romance all the sweeter. An especially fine aspect of this miniseries is its even-handed treatment of the Industrial Revolution in England and the class conflict it sparked.
‘Bleak House’ (2005)
Based on the Charles Dickens novel of the same name, “Bleak House” tells the story of young Esther Summerson (Anna Maxwell Martin) and her friends, Ada Clare (Carey Mulligan), and Richard Carstone (Patrick Kennedy), who are potential heirs of a massive fortune. The only trouble is that there are multiple, conflicting wills, fueling a convoluted and torturous court case, Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, which has been stuck in the throat of the English court system like a fishbone for generations, progressing at the speed of molasses.
As Ada and Richard are drawn into the grinding gears of the court case, they begin to develop feelings for one another. Meanwhile, Esther learns more and more about the mystery of her parentage—with far-reaching consequences. Filled with intrigue, plot twists, Dickensian satire, and well-drawn characters, this series will keep you guessing for all 8 1/2 hours.
‘Little Dorrit’ (2008)
The BBC version of Charles Dickens’s masterful novel is that rare work of cinema: an adaptation that not only equals its source material but even improves upon it. The story centers around a young woman, Amy Dorrit, who lives a life of poverty and hard work as she tries to care for her father, a selfish shell of a man confined to debtors’ prison (like Dickens’s own father was).
The entrance of a rich, kind, but rudderless man into her life, Arthur Clennam, precipitates an avalanche of events that will send Amy to the peaks of Victorian society, the slums of London, and the whispering canals of Venice—all while carrying in her heart the burdens of an ungrateful family and an unrequited love.
‘Emma’ (2009)
Another Austen adaptation, “Emma” tells the tale of the charming, kind-hearted, lively, but strong-willed young Emma Woodhouse as she attempts to matchmake in the Regency-era English countryside. Emma’s attempts to control other people’s lives eventually lead to serious complications and no small amount of heartache for herself and others. It will take experiencing the unpleasant consequences of her actions, along with the firm guidance of her friend and confidant, Mr. Knightley, to help Emma see the arrogance in her ways and the need for maturation and amendment. Lighthearted but not without substance, this production emits the charm of English country life with panoramic landscapes, bright colors, and quaint villages.
Romola Garai stars in the titular role, and she brings to the character a youthful vitality mixed with unexpected emotional depth. She shines. But Jonny Lee Miller as Mr. Knightley might steal the show. His wit, authenticity, noble-heartedness, masculinity, wisdom, and occasional vulnerability make him a joy to watch. The dynamic between these two outstanding performers keeps you riveted for all four hours.
All told, this list includes almost 30 hours of top-notch period drama. I can smell the popcorn my mom used to make every Sunday evening as we settled in to watch these. Make these shows (and popcorn, of course) a part of your favorite memories, too.