Zuckerberg Responds to Facebook Whistleblower’s Testimony, Says Claims ‘Don’t Make Sense’

Zuckerberg Responds to Facebook Whistleblower’s Testimony, Says Claims ‘Don’t Make Sense’
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks at the Paley Center in New York on Oct. 25, 2019. Mark Lennihan/AP Photo
Katabella Roberts
Updated:
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has responded to claims made by former employee and whistleblower Frances Haugen in testimony before Congress on Oct. 5.

Haugen, who used to work as a lead product manager for Facebook’s civic misinformation team, spoke before the Senate Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security where she discussed the company’s internal practices, particularly regarding how they disproportionately affect children.

The hearing was initially prompted by an exposé by The Wall Street Journal that showed that Facebook had hidden research data on the harmful effects of its platform.

Haugen accused Facebook of prioritizing profit before the well-being of its users, telling Congress that she believes Facebook’s products “harm children, stoke division, and weaken our democracy.”

Zuckerberg was notably absent from the hearing, having gone sailing instead.

However, the Facebook CEO took to his own platform later on Oct. 5 to respond to the testimony in a lengthy post in which he reiterated that the company places a special emphasis on the safety and well-being of its users, while stating that Haugen’s claims simply “don’t make sense.”

“Now that today’s testimony is over, I wanted to reflect on the public debate we’re in. I’m sure many of you have found the recent coverage hard to read because it just doesn’t reflect the company we know. We care deeply about issues like safety, well-being, and mental health,” Zuckerberg wrote.

“It’s difficult to see coverage that misrepresents our work and our motives. At the most basic level, I think most of us just don’t recognize the false picture of the company that is being painted.

“Many of the claims don’t make any sense. If we wanted to ignore research, why would we create an industry-leading research program to understand these important issues in the first place? If we didn’t care about fighting harmful content, then why would we employ so many more people dedicated to this than any other company in our space—even ones larger than us?”

He questioned why Facebook would establish an “industry-leading standard for transparency and reporting” if it wanted to hide the results of its findings.

Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen appears before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee at the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington on Oct. 5, 2021. (Matt McClain/Pool via Getty Images)
Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen appears before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee at the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington on Oct. 5, 2021. Matt McClain/Pool via Getty Images
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) (L) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) (R) speak to former Facebook data scientist Frances Haugen (C) during a hearing of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Oct. 5, 2021. (Alex Brandon/AP Photo)
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) (L) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) (R) speak to former Facebook data scientist Frances Haugen (C) during a hearing of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Oct. 5, 2021. Alex Brandon/AP Photo

“At the heart of these accusations is this idea that we prioritize profit over safety and well-being. That’s just not true. ... The argument that we deliberately push content that makes people angry for profit is deeply illogical,” Zuckerberg wrote.

Much of his post then turned to claims about the company’s research into children while simultaneously touting Facebook’s Messenger service for kids, which was released in 2017.

“But of everything published, I’m particularly focused on the questions raised about our work with kids. I’ve spent a lot of time reflecting on the kinds of experiences I want my kids and others to have online, and it’s very important to me that everything we build is safe and good for kids,” he wrote.

Zuckerberg noted that Facebook has worked on bringing a similar app for children under 13 to Instagram—which is owned by Facebook—however, the company has currently paused those plans after being urged to do so by some 44 state attorneys general from both major parties.

“Like many of you, I found it difficult to read the mischaracterization of the research into how Instagram affects young people,” he said.

The CEO stated that the company’s internal research into Instagram found that the platform “helps them” when they’re struggling, contrary to reports that it’s harmful to the mental health of teenagers.

“In fact, in 11 of 12 areas on the slide referenced by the Journal—including serious areas like loneliness, anxiety, sadness, and eating issues—more teenage girls who said they struggled with that issue also said Instagram made those difficult times better rather than worse,” he said.

Zuckerberg reiterated that Facebook is committed to doing more research into how the app affects the mental health and well-being of children, and advocated for Congress to update internet regulations.

“We’re committed to doing the best work we can, but at some level, the right body to assess tradeoffs between social equities is our democratically elected Congress. For example, what is the right age for teens to be able to use Internet services? How should Internet services verify people’s ages? And how should companies balance teens’ privacy while giving parents visibility into their activity?” Zuckerberg said.

“If we’re going to have an informed conversation about the effects of social media on young people, it’s important to start with a full picture. We’re committed to doing more research ourselves and making more research publicly available.”

Elsewhere in his statement, Zuckerberg also touched on the platforms’ global outages on Oct. 4, which saw Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp go down for up to seven hours.

He called it the “worst outage we’ve had in years” and said Facebook has looked into how they can bolster systems to prevent such a failure from happening again.

“This was also a reminder of how much our work matters to people,” he said.