data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b52f/2b52f081cdc2b52f8733779ba45db9729b55a30a" alt="Supreme Court Appears Wary of Limiting Biden Admin’s Social Media Contacts in Free Speech Case"
Supreme Court justices seemed skeptical of state arguments on March 18 that the federal government was wrong to communicate with social media platforms about public health issues during the recent pandemic.
At the same time, during oral argument in Murthy v. Missouri, the states argued that the federal government strong-armed social media companies into censoring disfavored views on important public issues such as side effects related to the COVID-19 vaccine and the pandemic lockdowns. Applying this kind of pressure violates the First Amendment, the states argued.
Dr. Vivek Murthy is the U.S. surgeon general. The state of Missouri and other parties sued the federal government for alleged censorship by pressuring social media companies to suppress certain content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1ebd/f1ebd27d3a8be85a7829884b2effdcb61fb06468" alt="Supreme Court Justices Indicate Curbing Censorship Could Cause Issues for Government"
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, appointed by former President Donald Trump, offered the scenario of Louisiana state officials being doxxed, with their private information being posted online. Some people then called for harming the officials, but the posts fell short of being illegal in and of themselves.
The FBI saw the posts and alerted social media outlets. The FBI says the posts are “significantly threatening,” Justice Barrett said in her hypothetical. Should the court block the FBI from doing that?
“I’m a purist on the First Amendment, so my answer would be ‘yeah,’” Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguinaga responded.Justice Barrett pushed back, asking if the official was aware of how often the FBI engages in that type of communication.
“That’s why I have my backup answer, Your Honor, which is, if you think there needs to be more, the FBI absolutely can identify certain troubling situations like that for the platforms and let the platforms take action,” Mr. Aguinaga said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ece11/ece1175aec3594aff25695078a25067bdc05e7c4" alt="Protesters in support of free speech picket outside the Supreme Court during arguments on March 18, 2024, on whether the Biden administration violated the First Amendment in pressuring social media companies to remove COVID-19 and 2020 election-related content. (Joseph Lord/The Epoch Times)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec431/ec4310de83aadbec61ac4cf551f5ae266f8589c3" alt="Jacob Burg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da147/da147adcabfb1994d44fa57df89e8ca305464631" alt="Joseph Lord"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/087e2/087e22428e199725df12df5b7b54ee0d085b1273" alt="Protesters in support of free speech gather outside the Supreme Court ahead of oral arguments in a major free speech case challenging the Biden admin's pressuring of social media platforms to censor content on March 18, 2024. (Joseph Lord/The Epoch Times)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da147/da147adcabfb1994d44fa57df89e8ca305464631" alt="Joseph Lord"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49207/492073492247d7ebbf9f2283fdc1c05abbff54c2" alt="Tom Ozimek"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d45b8/d45b8ed1022517a47c621450b97afc9e29162836" alt="Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Biden Admin’s Censorship of Social Media Posts"
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in a case that concerns what two lower courts found to be a “coordinated campaign” by top Biden administration officials to suppress disfavored views on key public issues such as COVID-19 vaccine side effects and pandemic lockdowns.