Supreme Court Justice Jackson Supports a Code of Conduct for Justices

Jackson made the comments on a Sept. 1 TV show but said she was not endorsing a specific proposal.
Supreme Court Justice Jackson Supports a Code of Conduct for Justices
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson speaks in Birmingham, Ala., on Sept. 15, 2023. Butch Dill - Pool/Getty Images
Matthew Vadum
Updated:
0:00

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said on Sept. 1 that she is open to an enforceable code of conduct being imposed on the court’s justices.

Jackson, who replaced Justice Stephen Breyer in June 2022, made the comment on “CBS News Sunday Morning” during an interview centered on her upcoming memoir, “Lovely One,” which will be published by Penguin Random House on Sept. 3.

“A binding code of ethics is pretty standard for judges,” she said. “And so I guess the question is, ‘Is the Supreme Court any different?’ And I guess I have not seen a persuasive reason as to why the court is different than the other courts.”

Jackson said that in principle she supports having an enforceable code but that she wasn’t endorsing any specific plan.

The justices approved a code of conduct governing their behavior in November 2023, but critics say the code is toothless because it relies on voluntary compliance.

Democrat lawmakers in Congress have said that the voluntary code is not enough, and many favor legislation known as the proposed Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act, which would force compliance.

The bill, introduced by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), would create a system allowing members of the public to file complaints against justices for violating a code of conduct or for engaging “in conduct that undermines the integrity” of the court. The bill would also allow lower court judges to sit in judgment of Supreme Court justices in ethics disputes.

The measure was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee but is now stalled in the Senate.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said in June that the bill “is not about improving the court—this is about undermining the court.”

He called the bill “an unconstitutional overreach” by Democrats aimed at undermining “a court they don’t like.”

Democrats have been ratcheting up pressure on the Supreme Court since 2022, when the court overturned Roe v. Wade and returned the regulation of abortion to the states. They have also expressed concern about conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito accepting gifts from Republican donors and not initially disclosing them.

Republicans have said that there is no evidence that Thomas or Alito has shown favor in court to any of those Republican donors.

Most Americans currently disapprove of the way the Supreme Court is conducting its business, a Gallup poll reported in July.

Americans remain divided along partisan lines on the court’s performance, with Republicans tending to favor the court’s activities and Democrats overwhelmingly opposing them.

The poll was conducted soon after President Joe Biden announced proposals to reform the top court, including a constitutional amendment that would impose 18-year term limits for justices, who currently enjoy lifetime tenure, along with ethics rules requiring the disclosure of gifts and a ban on political activity.

Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party’s nominee for president, has endorsed the plan.

Former President Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, has criticized Democrats’ push to regulate the Supreme Court.

“The Democrats are attempting to interfere in the Presidential Election, and destroy our Justice System, by attacking their Political Opponent, ME, and our Honorable Supreme Court,“ he wrote in a July 16 post on Truth Social. ”We have to fight for our Fair and Independent Courts, and protect our Country.”