The Supreme Court of Maryland voted 4–3 this week to uphold the constitutionality of a 2023 state law repealing the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse lawsuits.
A statute of limitations is a legal provision that bars the filing of a legal action after a specified period of time from the date the alleged crime or injury took place.
During oral arguments in September 2024, the court heard three consolidated cases and considered the authority of the Maryland General Assembly under the Maryland Constitution.
The court looked at the General Assembly’s decision to pass the Child Victims Act of 2023, which modified a 2017 law that barred child sexual abuse victims from suing once they reached the age of 38—20 years after attaining the age of majority, or 18. The court also examined whether the 2017 law had the effect of permanently shielding some defendants from liability.
Defendants argued that the enactment of the 2017 law meant that they could not be held liable in child sexual abuse claims, but the court said in its decision that when the General Assembly takes away access to a remedy for a legal claim, this legislative determination does not absolve defendants from legal responsibility.
The court decided that the General Assembly had authority to act when it passed the Child Victims Act of 2023, which repealed all time restrictions related to the filing of child sexual abuse claims.
Speaking for the court majority, Maryland Chief Justice Matthew Fader wrote that “the running of a statute of limitations [as in the 2017 law] does not establish a vested right to be free from liability from the underlying” events that gave rise to the legal action.
“We further hold that it was within the power of the General Assembly to retroactively abrogate that statute of limitations,” Fader wrote. “The Child Victims Act of 2023 is therefore constitutional as applied to the defendants in the three cases before us.”
Abrogation is the act of formally annulling a law.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Jonathan Biran wrote that claims “that were untimely on the effective date of the 2017 Act, or that became untimely before the effective date of the 2023 Act, could not be revived without violating the vested rights of the affected defendants.”
Attorney General Brown praised the majority decision because it removed restrictions that stopped victims of child sexual abuse from pursuing justice years later as adults.
“They will finally get their chance at justice and being able to expose the predators that harmed them ... and this law will allow that to happen,” he said.
The Epoch Times reached out to the Archdiocese of Baltimore and the Archdiocese of Washington for comment.
No replies were received by publication time.