This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.
A federal jury will decide whether a 29-year-old Uber driver set the blaze that would lead to one of the most destructive fires in U.S. history.
Arson and wildland fire experts push back on the government’s case against Jonathan Rinderknecht.
The judge said that ICE has failed to provide ‘reasoned explanations’ for such arrests at immigration courthouses.
The action names Prince Group, Huione, and H-Pay in a broader effort to disrupt online investment fraud and money laundering.
Both sides sued over a new law that bars local, state, and federal officers from concealing their identities and also ends local cooperation with ICE.
The Department of Homeland Security acted properly when it quickened deportations ‘to the maximum extent allowed by law,’ a majority said.
Other members of the cell convicted of terrorism-related charges received decades in jail.
A Chinese green card holder challenged a border official’s decision to place him on immigration parole because he was charged with counterfeiting.
A Michigan family whose home was foreclosed by the county over unpaid taxes argued that they should have been paid the fair market value of their home.
The court seemed skeptical of Damon Landor’s case during oral argument in November.
A federal appeals court previously ruled a lower court had not properly analyzed legal issues in the case.
The judge said he would allow the administration to file an amended complaint.
A public court filing says the scheme recruited clearance holders on LinkedIn and other platforms using AI photos and encrypted messaging.
The Supreme Court is expected to hold oral argument in the case during its new term, which begins in October.
DOJ lawyers argued Nicholas Roske’s eight-year sentence was ‘unreasonably lenient’ and failed to account for the gravity of his crime.
In its challenge, California called the requirement for congressional review under the CRA ‘illegal.’
The judge said the USDA lacked authority to waive the federal definition of food under the SNAP program.
Birthright citizenship, transgender sports, turning back asylum seekers, and a sweeping Hawaii gun law are on the docket.
The appeal is the latest turn in a legal battle going back to March 2025.
The judge wrote in her 75-page decision that the federal government was knowingly using inaccurate data to remove U.S. citizens from voter rolls.
