The Chinese regime has unveiled plans to mass-produce humanoid robots in an apparent effort to insulate itself from reliance on foreign powers by replacing Chinese workers with machines.
The strategy aims to make the CCP the world’s leader in the field of robotics by building a “humanoid robot innovation system,” developing artificial brains and limbs by 2025, according to the document.
By using a “whole-of-nation system,” the document says, the regime can harness “disruptive” technologies to “profoundly change human production and lifestyle and reshape the global industrial development pattern.”
The move carries national security implications and, according to several reports, will help the CCP maintain economic advantage even as its population dwindles following decades of severe restrictions on childbirth.
Communist Robots
China’s robotic push will also proliferate the CCP’s communist ideology and serve as an invaluable tool for the regime to champion its own interests.The regime’s robotic guidance document goes further.
According to the new document, all new robots and AI-powered artificial brains should be “guided by Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era.”
Adam Savit, director of the China Policy Initiative at the America First Policy Institute think tank, said that the regime could use the robots to spread communist ideology throughout the global marketplace.
“They will certainly try,” Mr. Savit told The Epoch Times. “The CCP takes advantage of any and all means available, especially innovative new technologies, to spread its ideology and expand its influence.”
Mr. Savit pointed to social media giant TikTok, which is owned by the CCP-affiliated ByteDance, as “the most successful and disturbing example” of the regime’s use of technology to spread its worldview.
To counter the risk, he said, the United States needs to do more to limit the outflow of its own research and technology to China to dampen the regime’s efforts.
“There is an urgent need to curtail U.S. outbound investment into China, especially for critical high-tech sectors like AI, quantum computing, and advanced semiconductors,” Mr. Savit said.
“A Biden administration executive order limiting such investments is set to be enacted in 2024. It’s a good start but it has been criticized for vague and likely ineffective enforcement mechanisms.”
The ideological underpinnings of the robot initiative underscore two more of Beijing’s strategic policies: military-civil fusion and forced technology transfer.
Military-civil fusion, the policy through which Beijing seeks to ensure that all civil technologies also provide the party with military utility, is borne out in the guidance document’s call to “support [robot] enterprises to join forces with universities and institutions,” ensuring the regime can leverage the technology and any associated research.
Likewise, the initiative will likely increase the risk posed to U.S. companies and their intellectual property as the regime searches for ways to “encourage foreign companies and institutions to set up R&D centers in the country,” where the CCP will have access to the related data.
CCP access to foreign companies’ data is a key issue in global security because of Chinese laws that categorize data as a national resource, thereby allowing the regime to seize any information stored on servers in the country.
The push for mass adoption of humanoid robots will require untold amounts of data, as the guidance document outlines that the project will seek to build a large language model training database to train AI brains for its robots and to innovate the “automatic” annotation of new data into usable information.
Apart from data, the regime also seeks to develop its own high-end semiconductors to facilitate “motion control and cognitive decision-making” in the robots, as well as “the integration of sensing, decision-making, and control” mechanisms.
With that in mind, the regime hopes to deploy its new communist humanoid robots to operate sensitive sites where it may have reservations about using human operators.
Capturing Global Markets
The CCP’s robotic renaissance is already well underway.
“Robot density is a key indicator of automation adoption in the manufacturing industry around the world,” IFR President Marina Bill said.
“China’s rapid growth shows the power of its investment so far, but it still has much opportunity to automate.”
To that end, Beijing appears intent on capturing the robotics market abroad, using foreign technology and state-run research institutions to centralize power over the manufacturing process before shipping its robots worldwide.
“Beijing aims both to achieve a high degree of self-sufficiency and to capture a significant share of the global market for a wide array of advanced products and components,” the report states.
This could result in the regime obtaining significant economic and military advantages in the future due to the cascading effects of being the first to mass-produce humanoid robots. By controlling the initial technology, the regime can dictate how the technology evolves.
“If it can gain an edge in what has been described as a fourth industrial revolution in manufacturing, while reducing its dependence on high-tech imports, China may be able to boost its own prospects for long-term growth while diminishing those of its competitors,” the report reads.
“Because future products and military systems will build on them, breakthroughs in technologies such as artificial intelligence could also yield enduring advantages.”
Arthur Herman, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute think tank, said that “the really scary thing” about the regime’s guidance document is that it could lead to the CCP gaining more influence in establishing international standards and rules over AI and robotics.
“You can guess what that means: China’s robotics industry becomes the global standard, pushing aside any competition, including setting the moral standard,” Mr. Herman told The Epoch Times.
“[It’s] not a good sign if we want to have sensible and responsible standards for future development of this potentially disruptive technology [that] everyone can live with.”
Mr. Herman expressed optimism that the United States is seeing a proliferation of its own robotic companies. Still, he’s worried about the nation’s lack of a coherent strategy for AI development.
“The difference is that, clearly, China sees this robot push as part of its $110 billion campaign announced in 2017 to become the world’s leading AI nation by 2030,” Mr. Herman said.
“We don’t have a national AI strategy, let alone a strategy relating to the intersection of robotics and AI.”
If the CCP can indeed dictate the direction of “successive generations” of robotic technology, the IISS report says, it could “yield more direct military benefits” that will compound over time, allowing robotic dominance to translate into dominance in AI and quantum computing.
All of those technologies are also critical to modern military development.
Soldiers of the Future?
This isn’t the regime’s first foray into robotics, AI, or military application. For two decades, the CCP has sought to bring “intelligentization”—the fielding of intelligent weapon systems—into reality.
Zeng Yi, a senior executive at Chinese state-owned military company Norinco Group, previously said that China will adopt lethal autonomous weapons by 2025, the same year that the regime’s new mass robot initiative will be in full swing.
Likewise, Mr. Zeng suggested that intelligentization will be the fundamental guiding principle of future warfare and that “AI may completely change the current command structure, which is dominated by humans” to one that’s dominated by an “AI cluster” that operates “just like the brain of the human body.”
To that end, the CCP is also investing in developing AI capabilities related to military decision-making and command and control.
Brent Sadler, a senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation think tank, said China would likely “be comfortable” with integrating AI-driven robots into its military decision-making apparatus, given the regime’s distrust of its own people.
“I see robots acting in a support role in war, [as] sensor platforms, as well as weapon platforms for attacks,” he told The Epoch Times.
“All of this is already happening today, but in the future, [it] would be more autonomous, and perhaps the decision to employ lethal force would be delegated [to robots].”
The prospect of the regime granting such technology authorization to use lethal force, he said, is a “real possibility.”
“This is different from Western notions of [the] law of armed conflict, morality, etc. ... I can see quite a lot delegated to robotic systems viewed as more trustworthy [or] controlled than humans by the CCP,” he said.
Mr. Herman said that the regime’s history of brutality suggests it may be more willing to adapt its robots to lethal missions than other nations.
“I don’t suppose a nation that had a policy of forced abortions will have any difficulty about police humanoid robots that sometimes shoot first, then let humans ask the questions afterward,” Mr. Herman said.
“They will be willing to stretch the moral boundaries of what constitutes human control over decisions involving lethality in ways that will be frightening.”
That future may be far off, however, and Mr. Herman believes that the next step in military AI will be “a hybrid teaming of robots plus human operators.”
“How far an authoritarian state like [China] is willing to delegate military decision-making to AI-enabled systems is unknown,” the report states.
“Xi Jinping and other Chinese leaders’ lack of confidence in the loyalty of the [military] may drive them to accelerate the employment of AI and autonomous systems to remove more decision authority from the ranks instead.”
