U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen arrived in China on July 6 to begin a four-day visit that has drawn concerns over the Biden administration’s continued effort to engage the regime in Beijing.
Ms. Yellen was greeted by Chinese officials led by Yang Yingming, director general of China’s Finance Ministry’s international cooperation department, as well as U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns, at Beijing Capital International Airport, according to China’s state-run media.
“We seek a healthy economic competition that benefits American workers and firms and to collaborate on global challenges. We will take action to protect our national security when needed, and this trip presents an opportunity to communicate and avoid miscommunication or misunderstanding.”
The American Chamber of Commerce in China, in its annual survey on the business environment in China published in March, stated that “inconsistent regulatory interpretation and unclear laws and enforcement” are among the top five business challenges its members face in 2023.
“Nearly one-quarter of members report their top IP challenge is the difficulty in prosecuting IP infringements in court or via administrative measures,” the report reads.
Ahead of Ms. Yellen’s arrival in China, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who sits on the Senate Finance Committee, took to Twitter to say that the United States must deal with China from a position of strength.
“Janet Yellen is traveling to Beijing on Thursday to meet with senior Chinese officials to discuss how to ‘responsibly manage our relationship,’” the Tennessee Republican wrote, citing a statement from the Treasury Department. “In order to take on China, we must pursue a policy of peace through strength, not peace through appeasement.”
Anders Corr, principal at the New York-based political consultancy firm Corr Analytics and an Epoch Times contributor, criticized the timing of the secretary’s trip.
“Yellen’s trip to China in the midst of >70,000 US fentanyl deaths annually and willful noncooperation on counternarcotics by Beijing sends a fatally weak message to the Chinese Communist Party,” Mr. Corr wrote on Twitter on June 5. “Mistake after mistake from the Biden administration.”
Concerns
Grant Newsham, a retired U.S. Marine colonel and now a senior research fellow at the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies, expressed concerns about the Biden administration possibly making concessions to communist China to set up these face-to-face meetings in China.“If I am wrong about this, I'll be pleasantly surprised about that. But that’s what I think’s going to happen. We’ve seen this before.
“It’s almost a repeatable process ... we go and talk we offer something in good faith. The Chinese don’t really change much.”
China’s hawkish state-run media Global Times, in an article on Ms. Yellen’s trip published on June 27, warned that the window to repair U.S.–China relations is closing and thus that “Washington needs to make sincere moves rather than creating new troubles.”
In response to the Chinese regime’s new export controls, international lawyer Dan Harris said Beijing just provided another reason for companies to move their manufacturing capacities out of China.
“My law firm was already experiencing an uptick in companies seeking our help to exit China, and this will no doubt add to this,” Mr. Harris wrote on Twitter on July 4.
Frank Fannon, managing director of Fannon Global Advisors and a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, wished Ms. Yellen “good luck” in China, following Beijing’s announced export restrictions.
“Tough job when the CCP narrow or reject areas of ‘shared interest’ daily,” Mr. Fannon wrote on Twitter on July 5. “The U.S. should seize the opportunity to lead free nations with clarity and resolve. Start with strong & unambiguous rules that U.S. taxpayer-funded IRA subsidies will NOT benefit PRC minerals or tech providers.”
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the communist regime’s official name.
Newly Revised Espionage Law
Compounding the problems that foreign companies may face in China is Beijing’s newly amended anti-espionage law, which came into force on July 1.The sweeping legislation broadens the definition of espionage to “all documents, data, materials or items related to national security and interests,” according to state-run media outlet Xinhua. But the legislation doesn’t specify what falls under national security, analysts noted, suggesting that could bring more risks to foreign companies and nationals in China.
“The changes to the law are having a chilling effect on business sentiment, and confidence in China’s market will suffer further if the law is applied frequently and without a clear, narrow, and direct link to activities universally recognized as espionage,” Mr. Allen wrote.
“The revised law and recent cases indicate China’s heightened concern about multinational companies’ access to and use of data and information. As written, the law may be interpreted and enforced with an expansive view concerning the types of due diligence and similar customary business activities deemed illegal in China.”