For a time, the once up-and-coming Australian politician Sam Dastyari became the poster boy for everything wrong with his country’s lax attitude in the face of ever-deepening foreign interference risks.
The Labor Party senator resigned from his post in 2017 following several scandals involving his links to a Chinese billionaire with ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) who once paid a legal bill for him. In 2016, against the position of his own party, Dastyari spoke favourably of Beijing’s aggressive moves in the South China Sea.
Now, in light of another Australian politician coming under scrutiny for her links to China, Dastyari is offering reflections on his own path to disgrace.
Rookie Liberal MP Gladys Liu, the first Chinese-Australian woman elected to the Australian House of Representatives, recently landed in hot water after media revealed her association with several organizations linked to China’s United Front, the key agency in charge of exerting influence and controlling overseas Chinese.
Both Dastyari and Liu were great fundraisers for their parties. In his interview, Dastyari said he learned that rich donors, who with every donated dollar help raise the politician’s profile in his or her party, have an agenda of their own.
While there are increasing calls for Liu to step down, the Liberal/National coalition government is implying that she is being targeted unfairly because of her Chinese heritage.
A similar argument was used by Chinese-born New Zealand MP Jian Yang, a National party MP who, according to the Financial Times, is also a big fundraiser for his party. After it was revealed in 2017 that he formerly taught at Chinese military academies that train spies, he said he had been the target of a racist smear campaign.
‘Most Advanced in Canada’
According to Australian author and ethics professor Clive Hamilton, the CCP began its policy of pursuing ethnic Chinese participating in politics overseas in 2005.This strategy, Hamilton adds, “is most advanced in Canada.”
The report adds that Beijing pushes Canada’s Chinese community to write China-friendly letters to the editor and start pro-Tibet and pro-Taiwan student associations on Canadian campuses.
One of the highest-profile instances of Canada’s intelligence agencies warning about foreign influence was in 2010, when then-head of the Canadian Security Intelligence Agency Richard Fadden said a number of municipal and provincial politicians, among them two provincial ministers, were under the influence of foreign powers.
The Globe and Mail later revealed that one of the ministers Fadden was referring to was Michael Chan, a former high-profile minister in Ontario.
Chan had been a major fundraiser for the Ontario Liberal Party, according to the Globe. Most recently, he has been speaking against the Hong Kong demonstrations and attended a rally organized by pro-Beijing groups in Toronto to condemn the protests on Aug. 11.
The One Constant
China is the one constant that comes up in various reports whenever there is talk of foreign interference risks to Canada.The report includes references to Russian operatives discovered in Canada and cites remarks by Canada’s former ambassador to China David Mulroney, who said Beijing uses Chinese diaspora groups and mobilizes Chinese students to influence Canadian politics.
As a G7 country and a member of a number of key strategic alliances, Canada is a prime target of espionage and influence activities by foreign powers, particularly China, according to Shuvaloy Majumdar, a Munk senior fellow with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
“Canada is of increasing interest to foreign agents who would like to either steal our technology or subvert our democratic society,” he said. “Whether it is Russian disinformation, or Chinese, Iranian, and Pakistani efforts to try and change how Canadians interact with our democracy, the threat of foreign interference to Canadian democracy is very real.”
The “disturbing reports about Chinese influence” in Australia, as described by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull in 2017, led to his country adopting new anti-foreign interference laws that came into effect this year. Among the provisions is a requirement for those acting on behalf of foreign entities to register with the government.
The new legislation resulted in former high-profile politicians, among them former cabinet ministers and a premier, resigning from their posts with organizations that have strong links to the CCP, prior to the laws coming into effect.
There has also been increased focus on and even some closures of China’s Confucius Institutes in the country. This comes as the regime’s footprint can be increasingly observed as pro-Beijing groups clash violently on Australian campuses with those supporting the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.
Majumdar says Canada should be evaluating Australia’s experience with its foreign interference laws as well as the experience of other countries in similar situations, and it should take action to bolster Canada’s defences when it comes to foreign interference and subversion risks.
“I think we can stand to inherit the best practices of all kinds of democracies, not only what the Australians are doing with their foreign interference laws, but also how democracies like Taiwan and Estonia—all who, from their neighbours or countries across shores, have to deal with very difficult existential risks—preserve their democratic society and their sovereignty,” Majumdar noted.
“All offer lessons on how Canada could create its own response.”