Potential Ukraine-Russia Peace Proposal Brokered by China Would Undermine US Reputation: Expert

Potential Ukraine-Russia Peace Proposal Brokered by China Would Undermine US Reputation: Expert
Russian President Vladimir Putin (R) meets with Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21, 2023. Photo by Grigory SYSOYEV / SPUTNIK / AFP via Getty Images
Tiffany Meier
Updated:
0:00

A potential Ukraine-Russia peace proposal brokered by China would undermine the reputation of the United States, according to Gregory Copley, president of the International Strategic Studies Association.

China released a Feb. 24 position paper that outlined the communist regime’s desire to be a mediator in the conflict.

On March 20, Chinese leader Xi Jinping arrived in Moscow for a three-day state visit to Russia, with Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin expected to discuss China’s proposal for resolving the conflict in Ukraine.

While the proposal from Beijing offers nothing tangible or substantive for either country, it does give them the excuse to sit down and negotiate, Copley told China in Focus on NTD, the sister media outlet of The Epoch Times.

Copley believes that if Xi can translate the meeting into some kind of success, such as a prolonged ceasefire or the start of a new negotiating regime, “then he will have gained enormous prestige, and the United States will have lost it.”

Copley said Xi was in that prestigious position because “both of the leaders—President Zelenskyy in Ukraine and President Putin in Moscow—have agreed that the PRC peace proposals had merit and were worth discussing.”

According to Copley, Zelenskyy might somehow agree to the Chinese deal, as it would enable him to survive within the Ukrainian polity.

“The generals are very angry with him [Zelenskyy] for having gotten them into this war in the first place, and for having managed it in such a way that there were huge losses to Ukraine,” he said.

Face-Saving Compromise

Copley said the deal is likely to involve some kind of face-saving compromises by both combatant presidents, while creating a larger trading environment postwar for Beijing and the Eurasian trading bloc.

“It may be that Russia will allow postwar Ukraine to trade through the Sea of Azov forts in Donbass, such as Mariupol,” he said.

“Maybe it'll be some kind of joint governance mechanisms which will be in place, which recognize the sovereignty of Eastern and Western Ukraine, or those parts which have now been absorbed into Russia. But there will have to be something which enables both sides to save face and improve their economic position,” he added.

The result of such a deal, he said, could be very damaging to the United States, as “a huge amount of the South—namely Africa, Middle East, Latin America, the Pacific and the like—actually are very happy to trade with the Eurasian bloc, Moscow, Beijing and the like.”

Statesmanship

In his opinion, the true intention of Beijing is to keep the United States engaged in Ukraine.

“They are not unhappy that the United States is being driven by the White House and State Department into escalating the conflict in Ukraine,” he said.

Meanwhile, Copley said the Pentagon is advocating exactly the reverse of that policy: a tamped down Ukraine and focusing on the main threat, which is China.

Copley believes that the US and its allies will attempt, at all costs, to undermine the Chinese peace deal and to insist that Ukraine keep fighting the war, which he said would lead to some “dangerous levels of escalation.”

With Poland increasing their supplies of lethal weapons into Ukraine and the United States committing so much funding, equipment, and, to a degree, manpower, into Ukraine, he said that the war there is on the verge of no longer being a mere Western proxy war against Russia.

“It’s being seen as a direct war against Russia. And if that breaks through some magical line, it could become a declared real war between Russia and the NATO states. And that would be really, really dangerous for all concerned,” he said.

“The reality is that we are going to see a need for greater statesmanship in the West, instead of this jingoistic policy of attempting to deflate Beijing’s successes by Western rhetoric building up the conflict. We need a lot more skilled approaches to see the West outflank Beijing, in the Middle East and Africa and in Europe, for that matter,” Copley said.

Hannah Ng is a reporter covering U.S. and China news. She holds a master's degree in international and development economics from the University of Applied Science Berlin.
Related Topics