New laws designed to review questionable agreements with foreign entities should also cover the activities of hospitals, according to the Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH).
DAFOH warns that a current exemption in the draft laws could open the door for Australian hospitals to continue entering partnerships with overseas medical institutions linked to forced organ harvesting.
Chinese hospitals, backed by Beijing, have faced fierce scrutiny for engaging in systematic organ harvesting practices targeting prisoners of conscience (particularly Falun Gong practitioners and Uighurs Muslims).
“This compromises Australia’s notable medical and ethical standards, thus directly undermining the very nature of Australia’s sovereignty,” it continued.
Commercial organisations and hospitals are currently exempt from the Bill’s reach.
“This exemption may have serious implications, such as Australian government-funded research facilities, hospitals, and state health departments, which have entered into arrangements with Chinese hospitals [being free from scrutiny],” the DAFOH statement read.
It noted that Guangdong has 17 hospitals listed as approved transplant centres and are considered high-risk locations where organ harvesting is known to occur.
Michael Shoebridge of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, has refuted these concerns saying the new laws would have little bearing on partners in friendly jurisdictions.
“The law is designed to ensure that the direction of research partnerships aligns with Australia’s foreign policy and national security interests, and close research cooperation with such partners almost certainly does so,” he told The Epoch Times.
“There will almost certainly be current or future proposed research partnerships that do not align with Australia’s foreign policy interests … some no doubt being with Chinese institutions with close connections to the Chinese government’s military and internal security apparatus ...” he said.