China Drops Landmark WTO Dispute Against EU

China Drops Landmark WTO Dispute Against EU
The headquarters of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is seen in Geneva, Switzerland, on Dec. 11, 2019. Robert Hradil/Getty Images
Katabella Roberts
Updated:

China on June 15 dropped its landmark World Trade Organisation (WTO) dispute aimed at forcing the European Union to recognize it as a market economy in trade investigations.

The WTO is a collection of 160 countries that cooperate on international trade matters under negotiated rules, and is overseen by an administrative system based in Brussels, Belgium.

According to a note by the Secretariat of the World Trade Organisation, China allowed the dispute to lapse, having initially bought it in late 2016, requesting consultations with the European Union concerning certain provisions of the EU regulation pertaining to the determination of normal value for “non-market economy” countries in anti-dumping proceedings involving products from China.
Hearings on the issue began within WTO in late November 2017 and, at the time, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer testified before Congress that this issue is the “most serious litigation that we have at the WTO right now,” noting, “I have made it very clear that a bad decision with respect to the non-market economy status of China…would be cataclysmic for the WTO.”
China lost an interim ruling on the matter last year after the WTO rejected the argument that Beijing’s 2001 agreement to join the WTO automatically granted it the right to be treated as a market economy in anti-dumping investigations after 15 years.

The United States and the EU said Chinese goods—especially commodities such as steel and aluminum—were still heavily underpriced because of subsidies and state-backed oversupply, giving Chinese exporters an unfair advantage.

The row had become an explosive issue for the United States, with President Donald Trump threatening to quit the WTO if the organization did not “shape up.”

One trade official close to the case told Reuters that so much of the ruling had gone against Beijing that it had opted to pull the plug before the result became official.

“They lost so much that they didn’t even want the world to see the panel’s reasoning,” the official said.

Without a WTO ruling in Beijing’s favor, the EU and the United States can keep imposing higher duties on cheap or “dumped” imports from China on a case-by-case basis while disregarding its claim that they are fairly priced.

On the same day that China allowed the dispute to lapse, the EU announced an unprecedented attempt to block Beijing’s subsidies to exporters. The 27-nation bloc will also unveil a proposal this week to protect European companies from Chinese takeovers.

Katabella Roberts
Katabella Roberts
Author
Katabella Roberts is a news writer for The Epoch Times, focusing primarily on the United States, world, and business news.
Related Topics