The long-delayed nominations of two key Department of Justice officials who will oversee the enforcement of civil rights and environmental laws were narrowly approved by the Senate on Oct. 11, over the strong objections of left-wing activists.
Although the Democrats’ ongoing, unprecedented blockade of President Donald Trump’s nominees across all agencies of the federal government continues, internal resistance within the Justice Department (DOJ) to Trump’s policy agenda is likely to be undermined to an extent, with the two new appointees in place.
Indeed, the confirmation of the two officials, both of whom were nominated in June 2017, may finally give the president firm control over two renegade divisions within the DOJ that are packed with career holdovers from the Obama administration. These staff members have gained a reputation for being more concerned with so-called social-justice activism than with simply enforcing the law and adhering to the tenets of the U.S. Constitution.
Civil Rights Division
It took 21 months for Dreiband to be confirmed, compared to the nine months in President Barack Obama’s first term that it took the Senate to approve radical leftist Tom Perez to the same post. While in the position, Perez helped then-Attorney General Eric Holder carry out what conservatives characterize as a war on police, immigration-enforcement efforts, and electoral integrity.Dreiband’s nomination is “the most important nomination of Trump’s, after court picks,” former Civil Rights Division attorney and bestselling author J. Christian Adams said in a brief statement emailed to The Epoch Times.
Adams hopes Dreiband will work to undo the damage he says Perez, who is now Democratic National Committee chairman, did to the division.
There is a great deal of work to be done. Perez refused to prosecute hate crimes committed against white Americans, helping to engineer the dismissal of a case involving two members of the New Black Panther Party, who had been accused of intimidating white voters in Philadelphia on Election Day 2008.
Perez helped to enact the Church Arson Prevention Act, which rested on the false premise that black churches were being targeted with disproportionate frequency by arsonists. He targeted then-Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio for legal harassment because he disapproved of Arpaio’s tough-on-crime approach, especially with respect to illegal aliens.
Reflecting the 2016 Election
Adams argued in his column that Dreiband and Clark are essential to returning federal law enforcement to the standards of the pre-Obama era normalcy:“Messrs. Dreiband and Clark are not needed just to cancel these radical and environmentalist fifth columns. As the Justice Department continues to see trustworthiness slide with the Comey-Strzok-Mueller-McCabe drama, Trump voters want evidence at Justice that Mr. Trump won the election in 2016.
“The Civil Rights Division must fully reflect the results of the 2016 election, where a radicalized anti-police pro-illegal immigrant, anti-election integrity cabal is defanged for good.
“This goes beyond race-neutral enforcement of voting laws. It is more than ensuring equities in employment, education funding, religious liberty, and others. A full reset is necessary.
The Nominees
Left-of-center advocacy groups typically characterize Dreiband as an enemy of minorities, the poor, and of civil rights in general. Meanwhile, conservatives say Dreiband will be a breath of fresh air at the Civil Rights Division—because he’s a principled conservative, as opposed to a leftist determined to radically transform the country.In his legal career, Dreiband has stood up for religious freedom, arguing against the government forcing religious-minded employers to violate their conscience by providing employees with birth control.
Dreiband previously served as general counsel of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), where he headed litigation teams charged with enforcing, among other things, the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Before that, he was deputy administrator of the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, where he enforced the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and other laws.
Clark is described by environmentalists as a friend of polluters.
Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) painted an unflattering picture of Clark, describing him as “a favorite of the Federalist Society, having chaired that group’s environmental law and practice group.” His nomination has been “strongly opposed by groups that care about protecting the environment,” he told The Hill newspaper.
In remarks on the Senate floor this week, Durbin noted with disapproval that as a lawyer, Clark represented BP, which was responsible for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010. He also said Clark said in 2014 that the science of climate change was “contestable.”
E&E News reports that in his new post, “Clark will lead the federal government’s litigation positions in cases dealing with pollution control laws, public lands, natural resources, wildlife, and tribal issues.”