WASHINGTON—A titanic legal battle looms following House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler’s (D-N.Y.) March 19 warning that President Donald Trump’s executive privilege claims on the forthcoming report of special counsel Robert Mueller were waived “long ago.”
And, Nadler said, “there is no provision in the regulations for White House review, and it would be unacceptable for President Trump—the subject, if not the target of the Special Counsel’s work—to edit the report before it goes public ... any claims of executive privilege covering the material in Mueller’s report were waived long ago, when White House officials agreed to cooperate with the Special Counsel investigation.”
Trump told reporters on the White House South Lawn on March 20 “Let it come out. Let people see it. We’ll see what happens. Let’s see whether or not it’s legit.”
In the present case, the debate centers around this question: Does Trump have the right to review any executive branch document—including a special counsel’s report—prior to its release to Congress or the public or is he excluded from such a review by the law, which specifies a special counsel report goes to the attorney general, who then decides whether to show it the president or Congress?
“Chairman Nadler is right to push back on the White House claim of executive privilege and the possibility that it would request redactions from the special counsel’s report,” Scott Amey, general counsel of the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) told The Epoch Times.
“The White House has the burden to explain its privilege claim, prove that the president personally invoked it, and prove that it wasn’t waived. Unless something was discussed or placed in writing at the time, any claim of privilege might be too late,” said Amey, who has been with POGO since 2003.
Others see a totally different situation regarding the special counsel and Trump’s right as the head of the executive branch to review the report.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told The Epoch Times that “the president runs the Justice Department and the idea that he is not allowed to look at it is just wrong.”
Judicial Watch is a non-profit government watchdog that has used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to force the release of hundreds of documents related to the Mueller investigation and the events that led up to it.
“There’s this notion that has crept in, and of course the Justice Department bureaucrats and the FBI bureaucracy have been happy to let it solidify, that somehow these agencies are separate and apart from the executive branch and that they are their own fourth branch,” Fitton said.
“We need to bring the Justice Department back into the government,” Fitton continued. “So the idea that they can do things separate and apart and over the objections of the president, that’s not the way our system is set up and it’s contrary to the rule of law.”
Former Federal Election Commission member Hans von Spakovsky agreed, telling The Epoch Times that “Nadler is quite simply wrong. There is no constitutional or statutory prohibition on the president seeing the report. He is the chief law enforcement officer of the U.S. under the Constitution, not the attorney general.”
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) of the judiciary panel told The Epoch Times he wouldn’t be surprised if committee Democrats file a legal challenge to Trump on executive privilege and the Mueller report, but he “doesn’t think they will find a very favorable outcome when it gets to the Supreme Court, if it does.”
