President-elect Donald Trump has filed a motion requesting that New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan dismiss his New York criminal case and verdicts against him.
“Wrongly continuing proceedings in this failed lawfare case disrupts President Trump’s transition efforts and his preparations to wield the full Article II executive power authorized by the Constitution pursuant to the overwhelming national mandate granted to him by the American people,” his motion, dated Dec. 2, reads.
It alleged that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg waged an “unconstitutional crusade” against Trump.
The motion came after Merchan adjourned sentencing previously scheduled for Nov. 26.
On Nov. 22, Merchan set a deadline for Bragg’s office to submit a response to Trump by Dec. 9.
The New York case is one of four criminal cases that were brought against Trump before the 2024 election.
Courts have already granted special counsel Jack Smith’s request to dismiss his federal cases against the president-elect, based in Florida and Washington. In Georgia, the court of appeals unexpectedly canceled an oral argument scheduled for this month over a judge’s refusal to require district attorney Fani Willis’s recusal from the case against Trump in the state.
Part of Trump’s motion cited President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, and alleged that the president’s statements cast doubt on the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Noting that language, Trump’s motion said that “these comments amounted to an extraordinary condemnation of President Biden’s own DOJ.”
It also noted that Matthew Colangelo, one of the lead prosecutors in the case, joined Bragg’s team after serving in Biden’s DOJ.
Trump’s motion also cites the supremacy clause and legal doctrine of presidential immunity as reasons to dismiss the case. It pointed to a DOJ memo from 2000 that Smith cited in his requests to dismiss the election interference case in Washington.
That memo states that “indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions.”