Supreme Court Filing: Jack Smith’s Appointment Is Unconstitutional

An amicus brief filed with the high court argues that Jack Smith’s appointment should have never happened.
Supreme Court Filing: Jack Smith’s Appointment Is Unconstitutional
(Left) Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks in Washington on Aug. 1, 2023. (Right) Former President Donald Trump attends his trial in New York State Supreme Court in New York City on Dec. 7, 2023. Drew Angerer, David Dee Delgado/Getty Images
Jack Phillips
Jack Phillips
Breaking News Reporter
|Updated:
0:00

Former Attorney General Edwin Meese and two scholars submitted an amicus brief with the Supreme Court that the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional and that every action against former President Donald Trump should be declared null and void.

“This Court should reject Mr. Smith’s request for certiorari before judgment for the simple reason that he lacks authority to ask for it,” according to Wednesday’s filing from Mr. Meese and two constitutional scholars. “Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution. Those actions can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices.”
Jack Phillips
Jack Phillips
Breaking News Reporter
Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter who covers a range of topics, including politics, U.S., and health news. A father of two, Jack grew up in California's Central Valley. Follow him on X: https://twitter.com/jackphillips5
twitter
Related Topics