A federal judge on Tuesday declined to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) accusing retail giant Amazon.com Inc. of tricking users into signing up for Prime memberships and then making it overly complicated for them to unsubscribe.
“Here, a reasonable consumer seeking to complete a purchase on Amazon’s marketplace could miss the small print at the bottom of the page,” Judge Chun said.
“Even though the price of Prime and the fact that the subscription automatically renewed were bolded, the disclosures were in smaller text at the bottom of the page in black and white while larger and/or colorful text at the top of the page told consumers that they were receiving the gift of a free trial, saving money on the cost of shipping, and receiving faster delivery for ‘FREE,’” he concluded.
The Epoch Times has contacted an Amazon spokesperson for comment.
Problem ‘Well Known’ Within Amazon
Described in the lawsuit as “nonconsensual enrollment,” the problem was “well known” within Amazon, the lawsuit alleged.The consumer protection agency further claimed that some employees at the retailer had urged company executives responsible for Prime to address the automatic enrollment issue so that Amazon would not be “tricking its customers.”
However, the company’s leadership “slowed, avoided, and even undid user experience changes that they knew would reduce nonconsensual enrollment because those changes would also negatively affect Amazon’s bottom line,” the legal filing alleged.
The agency further accused Amazon of knowing that some consumers were charged for multiple months before they canceled their memberships.
Canceling memberships was made difficult by Prime’s cancellation process, called the “Iliad Flow,” a reference to one of the two major ancient Greek stories attributed to Homer. According to the lawsuit, users had to ‘navigate a four-page, six-click, fifteen-option cancellation process.
While Amazon initially implemented changes to increase clarity among consumers, it later rolled back those changes because they resulted in a reduction in new Prime subscribers, the lawsuit alleged.
Eventually, amid “substantial pressure” from the FTC, Amazon revamped its cancellation process in April 2023, shortly before the FTC filed its complaint, according to the lawsuit.
However, the company “still requires five clicks on desktop and six on mobile for consumers to cancel from Amazon.com,” the complaint stated.
The FTC is seeking civil penalties and a permanent injunction against Amazon to prevent future violations.
Amazon Says FTC Claims Are False
Amazon has denied the allegations.“The truth is that customers love Prime, and by design, we make it clear and simple for customers to both sign up for or cancel their Prime membership,” the spokesperson said.
“As with all our products and services, we continually listen to customer feedback and look for ways to improve the customer experience, and we look forward to the facts becoming clear as this case plays out,” the spokesperson continued.
Amazon, in attempting to dismiss the lawsuit, further claimed that the FTC sought to “establish an entirely new theory of legal liability based on misleading and subjective characterizations of unremarkable marketing techniques.”
A 10-day non-jury trial in the case is scheduled for February 2025.
Amazon is also facing a separate lawsuit filed by an investor, D.M. Cohen Inc. over its alleged scheme to prevent customers from unsubscribing to Prime.
The retailer has also denied those charges.