A federal judge has blocked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rule requiring graphic warning labels on cigarettes, finding that the requirement went beyond the FDA’s authority.
“The first question is whether the agency has authority to increase the number of compelled warnings from nine to eleven. As the court reads the Act, Congress did not give the agency that authority,” Barker concluded.
Barker noted that the FDA had previously kept just nine warnings in previous updates to cigarette packaging requirements.
FDA officials had argued that Congress had just happened to choose nine warnings.
“The fact that Congress ‘happened’ to choose nine warnings is not dispositive, the agency says, especially since eleven warnings are not too much more burdensome than nine. But what Congress ‘happens’ to do is the law. Courts are not free to second-guess policy decisions expressed in the plain text of the congressional enactments,” the judge added later.
Barker entered a preliminary injunction blocking the rule while the case proceeds in the court system.
The FDA had planned to start enforcing the rule in February 2026.
R.J. Reynolds and the FDA declined to comment.
The decision marked the second time Barker has blocked the FDA’s warning label rule. In 2022, the judge concluded the requirement violated the companies’ speech rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.