Hawaii’s Democrat Gov. Josh Green is calling a proposed climate fee on tourists a “small price to pay” in order to preserve the state’s natural habitat. The hotel industry claims the charges will add more burden on their businesses.
Mr. Green expects the fee to generate $68 million per year, with the funds being allocated towards establishing a state fire marshal, installing fire breaks to safeguard communities, and aiding in disaster prevention. Half of the funds will be directed towards disaster insurance, without which some of the high-risk areas in Hawaii face challenges in rebuilding and attracting investors, according to the governor.
Supporters claim that the fee will help Hawaii’s beaches and state parks and that tourists will be receptive to it. However, there are concerns the extra charge imposes an additional hardship on the struggling hotel industry.
Lobbyist Kekoa McClellan, who has testified on the issue on behalf of the American Hotel and Lodging Association, said the current bill will only end up extracting the new fee from law-abiding hotels and that the fee would not be imposed on the tens of thousands of illegal vacation rentals in Hawaii.
“We know that none of these illegal operators will pay this fee,” he said. The association has asked lawmakers to “consider removing that burden on our hotel properties.”
The $25 climate fee proposal comes as the state sees a decline in tourist numbers following the Maui wildfires in August last year, which killed at least 100 people.
During his State of the State address last month, Mr. Green said that $25 is “not too much to ask of visitors to our islands” and that the funds will be invested in “beach preservation, fire breaks, and other prevention measures to help us avoid tragedies like the one last year in Maui.”
Taxing the Hotel Industry
Some lawmakers have suggested hiking hotel tax rates to raise more money from tourists. Hawaii already has one of the highest state hotel taxes in the United States.“I think ultimately, we know that we need to invest more in protecting Hawaii’s natural environment and that’s the reason why people come here, to enjoy our beaches, our hiking trails, our parks,” the lawmaker told Hawaii Public Radio.
The Hawaii Lodging and Tourism Association opposed the proposal, with the organization’s vice president Jared Higashi recommending the imposition of charges at tourist sites rather than raising hotel taxes.
“That’s kind of the model that we’re looking at, right? Charging people going into site-specific areas, especially those with heavy traffic, and using the funds that are collected at those sites to maintain and operate that specific site,” he said. “So, we know that the money that’s being charged there is going back to that specific site.”
In an interview with the New York Post, Rep. Sean Quinlan (D-Hawaii) said that the state doesn’t have enough money to manage all the places that are seeing a high number of visitors. For instance, people are seeking out obscure sites after seeing them on social media.
“It’s not like it was 20 years ago when you bring your family and you hit maybe one or two famous beaches and you go see Pearl Harbor. And that’s the extent of it,” he said.
“These days it’s like, ‘Well, you know, I saw this post on Instagram and there’s this beautiful rope swing, a coconut tree.'”