A federal judge denied an attempt by a coalition of states to block new Education Department regulations under Title IX that provides guidance on handling allegations of sexual assault and harassment on college campuses and K–12 schools.
Judge Carl John Nichols of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Aug. 12 denied a request by 18 attorneys general to stop the rule from going into effect on Aug, 14, while the court considers whether to strike down the rule.
The new Title IX rule was issued in May and aims to protect survivors of sexual misconduct while providing a framework for a more reliable adjudication process to respond to claims of sexual assault incidents.
It aims to also address the ongoing issue of schools and colleges either protecting survivors, while ignoring due process, or protecting the accused, while disregarding sexual misconduct.
They say the Education Department exceeded its authority when promulgating the rule, claiming that it “unlawfully [narrows] Title IX’s reach, making it harder for students to report, and for schools to respond, to sexual harassment.”
“We cannot turn classrooms into courtrooms, and we cannot allow our country to take such a backward step in the fight for justice. We are asking the court to stop this rule from going into effect and take this unlawful burden off the shoulders of schools across the nation,” Shapiro said in a statement at the time.
The judge, Nichols, denied the states’ request, saying that the attorneys general failed to establish a likelihood of success on their claims and show that they would likely suffer substantial irreparable harm pending the court’s review of the case.
DeVos welcomed Nichols’ ruling in a statement on Aug. 12, touting the ruling as a “victory for students” that reaffirms “students’ rights under Title IX go hand in hand with basic American principles of fairness and due process.”
“We can and must continue to fight sexual misconduct in our nation’s schools, and today’s ruling will help ensure that happens.”