A federal appeals court has temporarily blocked a discovery order from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan that would have required Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to turn over documents and respond to written questions about their role in advising cuts in certain parts of the federal government.
The appeals court ruled that Musk and DOGE had “satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay” and showed that they were likely to prevail in their claim that the lower court must resolve their motion to dismiss before allowing discovery to proceed.
The case, brought by New Mexico and a coalition of 12 Democratic-led states, challenges the legality of DOGE’s sweeping cost-cutting efforts, which have included the cancellation of federal grants and mass terminations of government employees from jobs identified by DOGE as unneeded.
“Oblivious to the threat this poses to the nation, President Trump has delegated virtually unchecked authority to Mr. Musk without proper legal authorization from Congress and without meaningful supervision of his activities,” the plaintiffs alleged. “As a result, he has transformed a minor position that was formerly responsible for managing government websites into a designated agent of chaos without limitation and in violation of the separation of powers.”
In a subsequent motion for a temporary restraining order against Musk and DOGE, the states also accused Musk of unlawfully exercising sweeping executive power without Senate confirmation by directing federal agencies to fire employees, cancel contracts, dismantle programs, and access sensitive government data.
In response, government lawyers urged the court to reject the emergency motion. They argued that the states had failed to show any imminent or irreparable harm and said the restraining order sought was overly broad, legally unsupported, and disconnected from core constitutional claims made by the plaintiffs. Even if Musk were improperly appointed, they argued, sharing data with him or others at DOGE does not, by itself, constitute an illegal exercise of government power. Musk is also not empowered to act without the president’s approval, they said.
Musk, as a special government employee, has been tasked by Trump to lead DOGE to help fulfill his campaign pledge of reducing waste, streamlining federal operations, and cutting red tape.
Critics of DOGE have argued that its activities raise security and oversight issues, and a number of lawsuits have been filed challenging its operations.
Musk recently revealed that the DOGE team has been receiving death threats on a daily basis.