Beijing’s effort to keep secret the identities of their fallen soldiers is part of a totalitarian impulse to control all information—to deny freedom. That denial helps account for the Chinese regime’s need to steal rather than invent technology.
Recently, a Chinese professor who cooperated in smuggling U.S. technology to the People’s Republic of China was arrested.
They formed an effective partnership. Shortly after their graduation, the pair created a company in China that vied with the U.S. firms.
“Prosecutors said that in October 2006, Zhang and his co-conspirators started a business in China to compete with Avago and Skyworks—while Zhang and Pang worked at those companies,” The Epoch Times reports. “They stole formulas, source code, technical specifications, design kits, and other documents marked as classified or proprietary from their American employers, the Justice Department said.”
So Zhang and Pang worked at the same time for Avago and Skyworks, and a copycat Chinese company that ripped off American products from the men’s U.S. employers. Zhang and Pang were a dynamite pair. They furthered a long-standing Chinese operation, indeed a long-standing totalitarian scheme, to steal American technology.
Zhang will face sentencing on Aug. 31.
The essence of the scheme derived from the totalitarians’ recognition that they weren’t the equal of the Americans when it came to the creation of new technology. Hence, the Soviets mounted a substantial program of subversion against U.S. technology; China has followed in those footsteps.
Although there are three times as many Chinese as Americans, and a great deal more young people educated in high-tech, a very high percentage of Chinese advanced technology is stolen from the United States.
Creativity depends on freedom, and the Chinese don’t have it, as we see from the way they deal with Hong Kong. The Chinese central government is clamping down on free speech in Hong Kong, making sure that decision-making is centralized in Beijing. In other words, the end of free speech.
It may well be that the central question of this moment is whether or not the democracies have the will to protect their intellectual property. I don’t know the answer. Time will tell.
It will be a tough battle.
If we do have the will to engage in this crucial battle, the key to our survival lies in our intelligence communities—their ability to identify our active enemies—and the willingness of our judicial systems to prosecute the thousands of thieves who are working to infiltrate our networks of researchers and laboratories.
At the moment, our network of research and development laboratories prides itself on its global outreach, which favors enemy espionage. This applies to laboratories run by corporations or universities, whether inside the United States or abroad.
On the other hand, we have defeated a well-disciplined enemy network in the recent past, discovering in the process that the Soviet people actually cherished freedom. Once they had a chance to be truly free, they unhesitatingly took it, and their talents were spread around the world. Are the Chinese cut from the same cloth?
We shall see.
