Christian Pastor James Domen alleges video-sharing platform Vimeo censored his non-profit for sharing videos, one of which was about how he left homosexuality. Domen is trying to get his case heard by the Supreme Court because he believes he should have the right to speak openly without being “eliminated” from public discourse.
“It’s not only Big Tech, it’s a monopoly of the few companies that, it’s almost like they’re a bot telling people ’this is where how you have to believe, if you don’t agree with what we believe we eliminate you,'” Domen added.
Domen filed a case against Vimeo in California’s United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2021 in which the judge ruled in favor of Vimeo. He is now trying to take his case to the Supreme Court.
Domen’s case is another example of how Big Tech is protected from accountability because of Section 230, which makes the media platforms immune from freedom of speech requirements that regulate newspapers and TV news.
In 2016, Domen founded Church United, a non-profit that helps pastors network and navigate government and culture. The group had three years’ worth of content on Vimeo.
“I shared my testimony of coming to Christ, sharing how I changed from homosexual to heterosexual, and more or less told my story. Vimeo reached out to me and said: you’re in violation of our terms, we’re going to terminate your account, delete your videos,” said Domen. “But we’re not just going to target you because of your sexual orientation. We’re going to wipe out 89 videos, three years of our nonprofit work of pastors sharing their stories.”
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields internet companies from liability for the good faith removal of “objectionable” content. On the campaign trail in 2019, then-candidate Joe Biden told The New York Times that Section 230 should be repealed.
Lawmakers in the U.S. House and Senate have also introduced bills to curb Big Tech’s power but Section 230 remains in place.