Western Business Fed Up With China

Western Business Fed Up With China
U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo talks with Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Jining during a meeting in Shanghai on Aug. 30, 2023. Andy Wong/Pool/AFP via Getty Images
Milton Ezrati
Updated:
0:00

Commentary

Both Washington and the European Union (EU) have shown increasing levels of hostility toward Beijing, especially in trade relations. Voices in Washington talk not infrequently about the need to “decouple” the U.S. economy from China’s. The Europeans prefer the word “de-risk,” but it comes to the same thing.

Independently and for their own purposes, U.S. and European businesses are moving in the same direction as their governments, less in deference to the authorities and more because of what is happening in China. This certainly is the message given by three important business groups: the U.S.–China Business Council, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, and the EU Chamber of Commerce in China. All three groups report what can only be described as a radical and negative change in sentiment among their members.

The council recently polled its 117 member companies throughout China. Some 28 percent of respondents expressed outright pessimism about future business prospects in China—a record. That figure is up markedly from the 21 percent who expressed such feelings in last year’s poll. Perhaps even more significant is the fact that less than half the poll’s respondents were able to express any optimism at all, and some 83 percent reported a decline in their sentiments toward business in China. Some 43 percent said China’s business environment deteriorated over the past 12 months.
The U.S. chamber polled its 325 members and got similar results. Only half of its members had anything optimistic to say about China’s business environment in the coming five years. This is the lowest percentage ever recorded in the survey’s 24-year history. As of 2021, a mere two years ago, as many as 78 percent of the members held optimistic views.
The larger EU Chamber of Commerce in China, with 1,700 members, hasn’t done a formal survey of late. Still, its president, Jens Eskelund, reported that his membership has also soured, adding that the number of Europeans in China today is lower than at any time in the past three decades.
The closed office of the Mintz Group in an office building in Beijing on March 24, 2023. The company said that five Chinese employees at its Beijing office had been detained by authorities on March 24. (Greg Baker/AFP/Getty Images)
The closed office of the Mintz Group in an office building in Beijing on March 24, 2023. The company said that five Chinese employees at its Beijing office had been detained by authorities on March 24. Greg Baker/AFP/Getty Images

All the respondents—American and European—gave the same reasons for the growing pessimism and ebbing optimism. Part, they said, grew out of the hostile attitude toward Beijing growing in Western capitals, particularly President Joe Biden’s moves to limit technology exports to China and restrict U.S. investments in Chinese technology.

More than this, they noted the changing Chinese policy environment. Many members called attention to Beijing’s restrictions on the export of rare earth elements and other materials essential to the production of batteries and electric vehicles. Top of the list, however, were China’s new anti-espionage laws and rules governing data collection and cross-border transfers of information.

On this last point, the Americans and the Europeans referenced Beijing’s order that government employees not carry iPhones or any foreign-branded device to the office. More pointed were the reactions to how Beijing has used its new anti-espionage law to raid the offices of the Mintz Group, a U.S.-based due diligence consultant. The cause was data collection on Chinese companies—in other words, the essence of Mintz’s business. Survey respondents further noted how the Chinese authorities then fined Mintz’s Beijing operation $1.5 million. Reflecting on the event, one European business representative bemoaned that, in China now, the red lines of what one can and cannot do have “blurred” and that this inconsistent approach has made the business environment much riskier.

Aside from policy concerns, important as they are, U.S. and European interests are no doubt also responding to the rise in Chinese wages. According to Beijing’s National Bureau of Statistics, wages and salaries in China have more than doubled over the past decade. This is a far faster rate of growth than the equivalent in Western developed economies or Japan. To be sure, Chinese wages have hardly caught up to their equivalent in Europe, the United States, and Japan, but the gap has narrowed significantly.

Even more significant, the rise in Chinese labor costs has made operations in Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and elsewhere in Asia more attractive than in China. These comparisons mean more to those producing in China for sale on the world market than to those who have moved into China in order to sell to that country’s increasingly prosperous population. This distinction no doubt explains why the new pessimism about China is more pronounced among technology and logistics concerns than retailers and service companies.

Washington and Brussels may have their reasons for wanting to distance their economies from China’s. It seems that Beijing has fed into the aims of these Western governments by giving Western businesses independent reasons to “decouple” or “de-risk” from China. In the process, China is losing the Western development and investment that it once enjoyed and that heretofore was such an important part of China’s economic progress.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Milton Ezrati
Milton Ezrati
Author
Milton Ezrati is a contributing editor at The National Interest, an affiliate of the Center for the Study of Human Capital at the University at Buffalo (SUNY), and chief economist for Vested, a New York-based communications firm. Before joining Vested, he served as chief market strategist and economist for Lord, Abbett & Co. He also writes frequently for City Journal and blogs regularly for Forbes. His latest book is "Thirty Tomorrows: The Next Three Decades of Globalization, Demographics, and How We Will Live."
Related Topics