US and Vietnam Against China? Well, Sort Of

US and Vietnam Against China? Well, Sort Of
U.S. President Joe Biden attends a welcoming ceremony hosted by Vietnam's Communist Party General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong (2L) at the Presidential Palace of Vietnam in Hanoi on Sept. 10, 2023. Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
Milton Ezrati
Updated:
0:00
Commentary

President Joe Biden just made the latest move in Washington’s competition with Beijing. After the recent G20 meetings in India, he flew to Hanoi, Vietnam, and signed an agreement to bring Vietnam closer to the American side in this U.S.–China competition.

Not surprisingly, Vietnam is acting cautiously in this matter, but it’s definitely a point for President Biden. Now, it is Beijing’s move.

The agreements reached in Hanoi elevate Vietnam and the United States in each other’s diplomatic and economic hierarchies. Referred to as a “comprehensive strategic partnership,” the agreement gives the United States Vietnam’s highest designation for a foreign partner, up from no status previously to an even level with Russia and China. In return, Washington will promote Vietnam as a dependable location for U.S. business operations abroad. Among the trade pledges President Biden made in Hanoi, he included help to expand Vietnam’s semiconductor and artificial intelligence production. The deal will likely accelerate the level of trade between the United States and Vietnam. It has doubled during the past five years as Western companies shifted operations from China to Vietnam.
A worker wearing a face mask while working at the Maxport factory, which makes activewear for various textile clothing brands, in Hanoi, Vietnam, on Sept. 21, 2021. (Nhac Nguyen/AFP via Getty Images)
A worker wearing a face mask while working at the Maxport factory, which makes activewear for various textile clothing brands, in Hanoi, Vietnam, on Sept. 21, 2021. Nhac Nguyen/AFP via Getty Images

Beyond bilateral Vietnamese–U.S. interests, the agreement clearly aims at Beijing. The American connection, although it has limited diplomatic status and no military elements, will give Hanoi leverage in its ongoing dispute with Beijing over Chinese claims for sovereignty over islands in the South China Sea and large stretches of ocean up to 1,200 miles from the Chinese coast.

This leverage, of course, is only implied and was certainly never mentioned during President Biden’s visit. On the contrary, General Secretary of the Vietnamese Communist Party Nguyen Phu Trong insisted as he signed that in reaching this agreement, his country was “not aligning itself with the United States against China.” Well, he might soften the effect in this way. China is, after all, Vietnam’s biggest trading partner and its primary source of raw materials for that nation’s manufacturing effort.

President Biden said his efforts to improve trade with Vietnam most definitely aren’t designed to “contain” China. He further insisted that “we’re not trying to hurt China.” According to reports from those who accompanied the president, he repeated these assurances so frequently that it was easy to believe that he meant quite the opposite.

Indeed, in light of American restrictions on the sale of technology to China and limits on U.S. investment in Chinese technology, the president’s decision to highlight efforts to build up Vietnamese capabilities in the production of semiconductors and other technologies does seem like a way to underscore American efforts to disadvantage China. If this implication wasn’t clear enough, President Biden, while disclaiming any intention to “contain” China, said part of his reason for courting Vietnam is to give the United States a “stable base in the Indo-Pacific.” The only reason to seek a stable base would be to contain the Chinese regime’s expansion.

The deal is something of a feather in President Biden’s cap. In the tit-for-tat character of Washington’s competition with Beijing, he seemed to score points last year with restrictions on exports of advanced semiconductors to China as well as advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment. He scored more points by getting Japan and the Netherlands to join the export bans.

Over the summer, Washington stepped up the pressure on Beijing with an executive order that will limit U.S. investments in Chinese technology. In a counter to these moves, China recently announced a technological breakthrough in semiconductor production that might render moot the U.S., Japanese, and Dutch export bans.

With this Vietnam agreement, the United States has partially countered the effect of China’s technological breakthrough by turning Vietnam, a close China trading partner, from its neutral-to-negative posture toward the United States to a more positive one. So far, Beijing has said little, but there will be a response.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Milton Ezrati
Milton Ezrati
Author
Milton Ezrati is a contributing editor at The National Interest, an affiliate of the Center for the Study of Human Capital at the University at Buffalo (SUNY), and chief economist for Vested, a New York-based communications firm. Before joining Vested, he served as chief market strategist and economist for Lord, Abbett & Co. He also writes frequently for City Journal and blogs regularly for Forbes. His latest book is "Thirty Tomorrows: The Next Three Decades of Globalization, Demographics, and How We Will Live."
Related Topics