It did what a helicopter or Osprey can’t. Its endurance was unmatched. Under fire, and in rough seas, it rescued thousands of sailors from situations no other ship, boat, or aircraft could. But at the end of World War II, land-based airports became much more common, and as was the case with almost all seaplanes, it fell out of use. Consequently, it was discarded in 1956 by the U.S. military services. And in doing so, they discarded capabilities they have yet to replace.
Two Variants
Initially, there will be two Catalina 2 variants, one targeting civilian/commercial use, and the special use variant (SUV) with more power and more range, targeting military and governmental applications. The civilian version will have a max take-off weight (MTOW) of 32,000 pounds, and the SUV version’s MTOW will be 40,000 pounds.Civilian/Commercial Use Variant
On the civilian side of things, the Catalina 2 will be able to bring passengers and cargo into areas and regions not supported by traditional airports. And along with being able to provide unique vacation experiences, the Catalina will provide civilian operators, and even governmental operators, with a highly capable platform for quickly responding to emergencies in areas accessible by seas, lakes, and rivers. Other use cases include fishery stocking, an air ambulance service, humanitarian aid, offshore facilities support, and VIP transport, etc. And while it will not be able to carry as much cargo as its beefier sibling, its 12,000-pound max cargo capacity is still very respectable and capable of meeting the needs of many potential clients looking to provide niche transport services. It will be certified to operate in Sea State 2 conditions.The Special Use Variant
Along with greater endurance and range than the commercial variant, the SUV version will be certified to land and take off in conditions of up to Sea State 3. But as was the case with the original Catalina, it should be able to handle rougher seas in situations of dire need. As noted, its range will be substantially greater than the civilian version’s 1,525 nautical miles, and its endurance will be greater than 20 hours. Its max cargo capacity will be around 16,000 pounds.But What About the Osprey?
Sailors have a joke: “The Osprey can wave at you while you drown.”The fact of the matter is that the viciously powerful hot jet/prop downwash of Air Force’s Marines CV-22 and MV-22 Ospreys, coupled with their tendency to overheat if forced to hover in one place too long, makes them almost useless as an air-sea rescue platform.
Additionally, while the Catalina 2 isn’t as heavy or powerful as the Osprey, it looks as if there are a number of scenarios in which it will be able to transport cargo loads farther than the Osprey due to its overall more fuel-efficient design. Further, being mechanically simpler, the Catalina 2 will almost certainly be more reliable and cost less to maintain.
Mass Rescues
When it comes to mass air-sea rescues, no other platform in the U.S. military inventory even comes close. An example of this unmatched capability can be found in World War II when LCDR Adrian Marks (USN) landed his PBY Catalina in 12-foot swells to rescue 56 sailors from the heavy cruiser USS Indianapolis, which had been sunk by a Japanese submarine. With no more room inside the plane, the crew strapped sailors to the wings. And then the Catalina used the tremendous lift provided by its massive wings to get back into the air and fly the sailors to safety.Coming When?
Deliveries are projected to begin in 2029, and as reported by Popular Mechanics, Catalina Aircraft already has a lead customer. Larry Reece, the president of Catalina Aircraft, also confirmed that he has received inquiries from civilian, government, and military sectors and that he and his team “look forward to supporting our future customers’ needs across the globe.”Of course, no Catalina 2 exists yet, and pricing is yet to be announced, but if Catalina Aircraft is successful in producing a modern, more capable version of the Catalina at a reasonable price point, it’s hard to imagine that there won’t be a lot of interest and sales for an aircraft that truly does what other aircraft can’t.