The climate movement’s annual showpiece, the United Nations’ Conference of the Parties (COP), held this year in Baku, Azerbaijan, was exposed to an unprecedented level of disinterest—even dissent—from developing nations.
Leaders of some of the world’s most resource-rich, economically aspiring countries opted to sit this one out, sending only low-level delegates, if any. This is the latest signal of a growing resistance to an anti-fossil fuel gospel advanced by the United Nations.
African, Latin American Leaders Question Fossil Fuel Bans
The tone of COP29 itself was a marked departure from prior gatherings. In Azerbaijan, where oil and gas production are integral to the national economy, the summit’s host, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, called fossil fuels “a gift from God,” lauding their contribution to global prosperity and stability.Global South Looks to National Interest Over Climate Ideals
In a surprising move, Argentina’s newly elected president, Javier Gerardo Milei, withdrew his country’s 80-person delegation from Baku less than a third of the way into the 11-day COP29. He cited the need for pragmatic energy policies that encourage development rather than stymie it.For Milei, whose presidential campaign was based on a pro-business, anti-bureaucracy platform, the message is clear: Policy must serve the economic needs of his country first. Argentina’s ongoing energy crisis, its untapped shale gas reserves, and a crippling economic situation demand a level-headed approach that prioritizes national interests over global climate ideals that are both batty and corrupt.
Milei’s political philosophy resonates with a growing number of leaders in the global south who view economic growth as paramount and recognize that access to energy is fundamental to achieving it.
Argentina’s departure from COP29 is a turning point that should serve as a wake-up call to the United Nations and its allies. The time for one-size-fits-all mandates is over. The rigid orthodoxy of fossil fuel divestment pushed by the United Nations and wealthy nations is losing ground, challenged by leaders who refuse to sacrifice their national interests to a destructive agenda.
For much of the global south, the idea of an immediate energy transition remains, at best, aspirational and, at worst, profoundly out of touch. The reality is that fossil fuels still power 80 percent of global energy consumption. This isn’t just an inconvenient truth; it’s an inescapable basis of modern civilization that developing nations understand viscerally.
The COP29 circus has concluded in Baku, and the world is seeing the crumbling of the long-held illusion that a global transition to green energy is feasible, much less fair and desirable. Developing nations are proclaiming that they will not be deprived of necessary energy sources by nations that continue to feast on the very fossil fuels they frown upon. The disconnect between rhetoric and reality is stark, and developing countries are calling attention to it.
Fossil fuels are not a relic of the past; for many countries, they are the key to a prosperous future—truly “a gift from God.”