Chinese Regime Panics Over Economy

Chinese Regime Panics Over Economy
Paramilitary policemen patrol in front of the People's Bank of China, the central bank of China, in Beijing on July 8, 2015. Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images
Michael Wilkerson
Updated:
0:00
Commentary

In the wake of a rapidly deteriorating domestic economy, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), China’s central bank, announced on Sept. 24 a blizzard of monetary stimulus policies designed to fend off a potential financial crisis.

Regulatory authorities are taking a raft of emergency actions intended to ease the strain on the nation’s banks and other lenders, as well as on beleaguered consumers, and to revive economic growth.

Among other things, the PBOC has reduced the costs of borrowing from the central bank, making it easier for banks to access funds, and has injected the equivalent of tens of billions of dollars of liquidity into the financial system in an attempt to stabilize the markets. The PBOC has lowered the minimum regulatory reserve ratio for Chinese banks, effectively reducing the amount of capital banks are required to hold against their risk assets. The move is intended to increase market liquidity and make it easier for the banks to lend. It also eases the pressure on weaker banks that were under strain and at risk from dangerously low capital reserves.

Addressing Chinese consumers, the PBOC has lowered the rates on existing mortgages and reduced the down payment required on second home purchases to 15 percent from 25 percent. Deposit rates will be lowered to protect the banks’ margins and induce consumers to spend rather than save.

Faced with a moribund stock market, the PBOC has also announced a facility that will allow securities brokerage firms and investment funds to access the central bank’s liquidity to buy stocks. This state intervention in support of stock market valuations is highly unusual and could reflect a sense of panic that may have set in among authorities in Beijing.

The PBOC is fighting against a rising tide of deflationary pressure. The Chinese economy never fully recovered from the pandemic-induced shuttering of businesses in the domestic market in 2020. China adopted some of the world’s most stringent lockdown practices, and the “zero-COVID” policy of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) left many of those restrictions in place through 2022. Productivity declined, and economic growth stagnated. For some, years of training and education were lost.

At the same time, the CCP changed course and announced a reining in of perceived capitalistic excesses in the markets. With this came greater economic intervention, which produced a chilling effect on financial markets and the broader economy. U.S. and other foreign investors in China began to unwind their positions and reduce exposure to Chinese equity markets—a trend that has continued throughout this year. The price of an index of Chinese stocks has fallen by more than 22 percent in the past three years, for example, during a period of strong stock market performance in the United States and Europe.

This year, national income growth is slowing and is likely to fall below the nation’s target of 5 percent. Youth unemployment is above 17 percent, an additional consequence of the COVID-19 era. Housing price growth has turned negative as excess inventories and depressed values plague homeowners and bank balance sheets alike. Export markets have slowed as the United States and other nations reconsider their trade policies with China. This places more pressure on the domestic economy as economically insecure consumers refuse to open their wallets and spend.

Rumors of rising frustration and social unrest are circulating, raising the stakes for the ruling CCP. Authorities cannot afford to let the economy go off the rails and appear to have pulled out all the stops to prevent it.

The recent policy actions by the PBOC are a warning sign to the global economy. China remains the world’s second most populous country and second-largest economy. The United States and Europe—each struggling with their own challenges in their domestic economies—are not immune to knock-on effects from China. Economic growth in Europe is stagnant, with many economies already in recession. The U.S. economy shows signs of weakness, generating enough concern for the Federal Reserve governors to motivate them to lower interest rates by 50 basis points. The last times the Fed reduced rates by such a large amount in one fell swoop were on the eves of the “dotcom” bubble (2000) and the global financial crisis (2007).

The risks of a financial crisis in China extend beyond our economy and financial markets, although those risks are grave enough. Despite our challenges with China, it is not in the strategic interests of the United States for China to fall into an economic depression.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Michael Wilkerson
Michael Wilkerson
Author
Michael Wilkerson is a strategic adviser, investor, and author. He's the founder of Stormwall Advisors and Stormwall.com. His latest book is “Why America Matters: The Case for a New Exceptionalism” (2022).
twitter