The protest coincided with the opening of the twice-a-decade Chinese Communist Party (CCP) congress in Beijing, where Xi Jinping was expected to be given an unprecedented third term.
The violence by “diplomats,” who thereafter emerged from the consulate, targeted art depicting Xi as an emperor who wears no clothes. The artist depicts Xi admiring himself with the false belief that he represents 1.4 billion Chinese people.
The consul general suspected in the violence, Zheng Xiyuan, wore a beret and was accompanied by thugs who attempted to bring the banner of Xi back into the consulate.
Chan called the violence “barbaric.”
Eventually, one officer heroically entered the consulate grounds to halt the beating and retrieve the protester.
Chan later told the BBC: “It’s ridiculous. They [the attackers] shouldn’t have done that. We are supposed to have the freedom to say whatever we want here [in the UK].”
British government ministers are being accused, including by members of their own Conservative Party, of a “totally inadequate” response to the violence.
Former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith said the government should tell China’s diplomats that “if they do not follow [British] rules, they get expelled.”
Manchester is the latest incident of Beijing’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy gone mad and now combined with its transnational repression. The CCP appears to simultaneously encourage this behavior among its diplomats and then cover it up when it causes outrage abroad.
They supposedly target transnational crime, which is broadly defined by the Chinese regime to include some free speech at odds with CCP dogma, including that practiced in Manchester. Like the Manchester violence, they invite an illegitimate use of force on foreign soil by an illegitimate government.
From April 2021 to July 2022, the regime arrested 230,000 people, mostly from Southeast Asia, according to the NGO.
“These operations eschew official bilateral police and judicial cooperation and violate the international rule of law, and may violate the territorial integrity of third countries involved in setting up a parallel policing mechanism using illegal methods,” the report states.
That sounds like Manchester.
No person, regardless of diplomatic status, should have the right to commit violence without consequence against those conducting free speech activities.
Beijing’s international thuggery and “police” violence must end. The CCP is illegitimate—and so is its extension of thuggery around the world.
Any of China’s consul generals who see it as their duty to limit free speech in their host countries through violence or other means should be sent home. Allowing CCP thugs to masquerade as diplomats representing 1.4 billion Chinese people just buys into their lies and empowers their crimes.