China in Cuba: Nuclear-Armed Communists on the Warpath

Chinese navy ships enter the port of Havana, in a file photo. Yamil Lage/AFP via Getty Images

Commentary

China, according to “fragmentary” U.S. intelligence reports, is about to establish a “joint military training facility” with Cuba on that island.

Chinese military personnel are already listening in on American communications from the Lourdes base near Havana and three other Cuban locations. Two of those locations have been known for some time: Bejucal and Santiago de Cuba. These facilities, it appears, have been in operation for all or most of this century.

“What is missing is the strategic aim of China’s economic influence, which, in my opinion, goes beyond simply having a strong trade relationship with Latin America,” Joseph Humire of the Center for a Secure Free Society told Gatestone. “At its core, the People’s Republic of China is focused on gaining geopolitical leverage over countries in Central and South America to be used in an eventual conflict with the United States.”

China, with that leverage, is obtaining permission to build in this hemisphere military installations that can be used to attack the American homeland or the U.S. military, should China launch its invasion of Taiwan, Japan, or some other target. China, for instance, is developing what looks like a naval base at the tip of Argentina, at strategic Tierra del Fuego.

Moreover, China’s troubled container port in Freeport, Bahamas, about 90 miles from Palm Beach, Florida, could end up hosting Chinese naval vessels.

It also may not be long before China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) bases substantial forces on Cuba, only 94 miles from Key West, Florida.

“For a near-term war, China would use Cuba as a base for projecting and facilitating massive cyberattacks and espionage operations while working with Cuba’s formidable intelligence services to undertake a range of ‘wet’ operations, from assassinations to attacks on U.S. installations, even civilian facilities such as gas stations,” Richard Fisher of the International Assessment and Strategy Center told Gatestone.

In addition, the PLA could deploy anti-ship cruise missiles in Cuba both to hit U.S. Navy bases in Florida and block the movement of American vessels. China might also put surface-to-air missiles on Cuba, potentially to shoot down planes over the southeast United States.

How about a second Cuban Missile Crisis, this time with the Chinese instead of the Soviets? China’s leaders are brazen, as the spy balloon incident of January and February suggests. Would they deploy ballistic missiles and other weaponry there?

Fisher thinks they will.

“In the medium term, look for China to facilitate Cuba’s acquisition of ballistic missiles, which will, at a minimum, force a U.S. defensive response that will tie down the U.S. military, reducing U.S. chances of success in other theaters,” he said.

Ballistic missiles can carry nuclear warheads. While Americans think of nukes as defensive instruments to deter attacks, Chinese war planners view them as offensive weapons, to compel submission. In other words, China thinks it can prevent others from coming to the aid of, say, Taiwan by threatening nuclear destruction of their homelands.

Periodically throughout this century, China’s generals and civilians have made unprovoked threats to incinerate American cities. American presidents have brushed off the warnings, ignoring the hostile words.

That is no longer a good idea, if it ever was. The Pentagon in a November 2022 report forecast that China would quadruple its warheads from about 400 then to 1,500 by 2035.

The Chinese military is moving swiftly. The PLA, in three separate fields in the northern part of the country, is building at least 250 and perhaps as many as 360 silos, which appear designed to take the DF-41 missile. A DF-41 has a maximum range of 9,300 miles—putting all of America in range from those three locations—and can carry, some believe, 10 warheads apiece.

“For decades, they were quite comfortable with an arsenal of a few hundred nuclear weapons, which was fairly clearly a second-strike capability to act as a deterrent,” Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall said in testimony in March, referring to China.

“I don’t think I’ve seen anything more disturbing in my career than the Chinese ongoing expansion of their nuclear force.”

So as China increases its arsenal, it’s clear that Beijing no longer seeks only a “minimal deterrent.” The rapid buildup, therefore, suggests that the Chinese military is building an offensive “war-fighting” capability.

With all the additional silos in China, why would the People’s Liberation Army need missiles in Cuba? Think shorter flight times—meaning less warning time.

Moreover, U.S. missile defenses—and radars—are currently oriented to attacks from over the Arctic, from the north. Cuba gives China venues for southern attacks.

All this means that, thanks to Cuba, a war in Asia will be fought on, near, and over the American homeland—perhaps with nukes.

Originally published by Gatestone Institute

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.