Within the first hour of Joe Biden’s presidency, the commander-in-chief fired a little-known figure running an agency that most Americans have likely never heard of.
Yet that firing was symbolically and substantively significant.
The opening act in Biden’s purge of Trump administration officials was the sacking of Michael Pack. (Full disclosure: Pack is an acquaintance of mine going back to his time as president of the Claremont Institute, where I am a fellow.)
In that role, Pack threatened to do the unforgivable: adhere to the law by fairly presenting the Trump administration’s agenda to the world, rebalancing USAGM content away from progressivism, and confronting tyrannical regimes in the information battlespace.
First, he was subjected to an interminably long, character-assassinating confirmation process that nearly ran out the clock on his appointment entirely.
Despite that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued several reports over the years highlighting this issue, USAGM leaders had cleared people who “made up false Social Security numbers, failed to file fingerprints, failed to complete forms.”
“It got to the point,” Pack said, where the OPM “revoked the ability of the agency to approve suitability clearances. ... And after it was no longer allowed to grant these clearances, the agency granted them anyway. And this included, in addition to the 1,500 improperly cleared ... a small but significant number of top-secret and above clearances.”
For having the temerity to seek to, among other things, re-clear this mass of employees, and remedy this major security failure, Pack faced a firestorm. This episode was illustrative of what transpired during his short tenure.
Pack’s firing represented the culmination of the more than three-year jihad waged against him. As Pack put it of his opponents, “They wanted to stop any person appointed by Donald Trump to fulfill any aspect of his agenda, and the people who are against Donald Trump have been ruthless in every capacity.”
And it had consequences that implicated national security going beyond the aforementioned malfeasance around security clearances.
It’s imperative to compete against foreign adversaries in the realm of ideas. Pack agrees, holding consistent with the Trump administration’s view, that “it is very important, and it’s particularly important now that China, especially, but also Iran and North Korea and others, are ramping up their own information efforts to put forward their vision of the world and their ideas and their story.”
“We need to sort of push back and put a positive view of what our ideas and our principles are,” he said.
He had pledged to do so, and now he won’t get that chance.
It’s unclear what, if anything, the Biden administration will do in connection with that effort.
And as alluded to previously, when Secretary of State Antony Blinken and national security adviser Jake Sullivan’s CCP counterparts lambasted America for its purported human rights failings—those frequently raised by our nation’s left—their response was to concede the premise, but call it a strength that we could recognize our failings and seek to be better.
Beyond the fact that the Trump administration likely would have never held such a meeting, the executive branch almost certainly would not have acceded to this narrative. One can bet that the USAGM under Pack would have fought it, and exposed it for the propaganda that it was.