That makes the appearance of China as a strategic priority an important event.
“China’s stated ambitions and assertive behavior present systemic challenges to the rules-based international order and to areas relevant to Alliance security,” the communiqué stated.
Better Late than Never
While the new focus on China is likely to be welcomed by many, experts and NATO insiders are quite aware that there has been growing frustration over the alliance’s apparent sluggishness in responding to the Chinese regime’s operations.Stefanie Babst, a senior associate fellow for the European Leadership Network, a group of leaders working on political and security issues, spoke about NATO’s slow response to the growing Beijing threat during a webinar hosted by the German Marshall Fund of the United States on Jan. 19.
“We are late,” Babst said. “We are late in the game.”
“NATO has always been a little bit late in the game when it comes to acknowledging that there is really something important out there on the strategic horizon,” she added. “But on China, I think, we were particularly late.”
Better late than never seemed to be the mood of the webinar, however, and Babst highlighted what she considered to be many points of mutual or converging interests that NATO and the Chinese regime might be able to work on together.
Importantly, Babst said, these issues could be approached in a meaningful and mission-oriented way, without getting bogged down in too many high-level discussions.
Babst pointed out that, while the Chinese regime had historically preferred bilateral relations to multilateral relations, its leadership was growing adept at playing other multilateral organizations, such as NATO, against themselves.
‘Principled Engagement’ Needed
One of the greatest difficulties now faced by NATO, then, is balancing its need to defend against the Chinese regime aggression with its desire to engage Beijing in meaningful international work.For that, it’s hoped that the Strategic Concept will provide important guidance.
“The Strategic Concept reaffirms NATO’s values, purpose, overall tasks, and it gives very importantly, collective allied assessment of our security environment,” Robert Dresen, a policy planning adviser at NATO headquarters, said during the webinar.
Dresen noted that China’s integration within the global community both economically and diplomatically meant that real engagement was necessary and outright aggression was to be avoided except when strictly unavoidable.
“China is becoming more active in our own region and in the regions around us,” Dresen said. “China is impacting the international rules-based order. And, as, such, we have obligation to consider that and to develop a strategy about it.”
“We need principled engagement with China based on what their concerns are but also on our interests, on our mutual interests.”
NATO’s developing policy toward the PRC is thus something along the lines of friendly but firm.
Alliance leaders will need to refrain from hostility but also hold their ground, Dresen said. They will need to avoid looking for fights but be realistic in their expectations on hot-button issues. Moreover, they will need to uphold the values that the alliance was built on: liberty, democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.
Dresen said that such would demand more effectively engaging with the alliance’s partners in the region.
“These conversations are also very important as we go forward on charting a way toward China, because these countries understand China’s behavior very well and we can learn a lot from them,” Dresen said.
Dresen underscored, however, that although the allies were coming to a consensus on how to integrate their approach to the PRC, NATO had no ambition of reaching beyond its mission as a trans-Atlantic organization.
“NATO has no ambition to become a military player in the Indo-Pacific region,” Dresen said. “But Chinese actions and state ambitions do have impacts on the security configuration, both in our allied areas and adjacent to them.
“We are talking about an approach to China that is not confrontational, but that is realistic, and makes sure that the alliance will be able to deal with the rise of China in the years ahead.”