Misinformation promoted by NBC and two other news outlets about Rudy Giuliani was later corrected, although some readers may remain unaware because the network failed to fully correct its reporting.
But some social media posts promoting the information went uncorrected, including from the sole author of NBC’s piece.
NBC News correspondent Ken Dilanian, who as a Los Angeles Times reporter violated that newspaper’s policy by sharing entire stories with the CIA prior to publication, hasn’t alerted his approximately 207,000 followers on Twitter that his story about Giuliani and the FBI was corrected. Neither has NBC Investigations.
Dilanian not only shared the story from the NBC Investigations account, but retweeted a tweet from “Meet the Press” that denigrated Giuliani for allegedly being briefed by the FBI but dismissing the warning, a review of his Twitter page by The Epoch Times shows.
The differences are puzzling to Andrew Schotz, a member of the Society of Professional Journalists’ (SPJ) Ethics Committee.
“If you are a large organization like NBC and you have multiple feeds going at the same time ... it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to have an error on one feed and then correct it on a different feed because you’re now possibly reaching a different audience,” he told The Epoch Times.
NBC didn’t respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
None of the corrections contained an apology and none of the updated stories identified the sources, rankling Giuliani.
“Where did the original false information come from?” he wrote in a tweet.
The Washington Post declined to comment for this story. The New York Times didn’t respond to an inquiry.
“It’s an important topic because the public notions of corrections is that the error is on page one and the correction is on page 20. It’s kind of a cynicism that if you make an error, you’re not going to be as forthright about it,” Schotz, the SPJ ethics expert, told The Epoch Times. News organizations should make an effort to combat that notion by focusing on both correcting mistakes and informing readers of the corrections, he added.
Each of the three organizations offered different corrections.
NBC explained how its original story relied on a single anonymous source, adding that a second source had emerged to say the FBI prepared a briefing but didn’t deliver it to Giuliani. The Post went into less detail, telling readers that it was removing assertions that Giuliani had received the briefing. And the NY Times merely said its first version incorrectly said Giuliani was warned by the FBI.
NBC “peeled back a little bit of the process” while the Post “is not telling people what happened,” although they are “being very clear about their correction,” Schotz said. The NY Times had a story full of details “but at the end they just kind of plump down, ‘yeah, this was said previously, and it turns out to not be true.’ It’s not a very robust way to explain the process and how this came to be.”