Video-conferencing app Zoom, which has surged in popularity amid the global CCP virus pandemic, is facing mounting privacy and security concerns after research reports and the CEO’s disclosure revealed its encryption keys were being transmitted to servers in China in some cases.
The backlash reached a crescendo recently with Taiwan’s recent banning of any government use of Zoom, citing security concerns. The April 7 measure marked the first time a government had imposed a formal action against the company.
In the United States, a similar picture is emerging. Experts told The Epoch Times that concerns related to Zoom’s alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party are absolutely warranted.
Watchdog group Citizen Lab recently examined Zoom’s encryption during multiple test calls in North America, in which they found keys for encrypting and decrypting meetings were “transmitted to servers in Beijing.” The report stated that Zoom used “non-industry-standard cryptographic techniques with identifiable weaknesses.”
Casey Fleming, chairman and CEO of intelligence and security strategy firm BlackOps Partners, said Americans should be very wary of any software or hardware created or manufactured in China.
“The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) completely controls all production and exploits every opportunity to steal intellectual property and innovation through every means possible,” Fleming told The Epoch Times. “Economic espionage is part of the CCP’s grand strategy of Hybrid Competition (Warfare) to defeat the United States, capitalism, and democracy to ultimately control the world.
“The world is waking up to how ruthless and evil the Chinese Communist Party really is and their true intentions,” he said. “Recent CCP actions and statements reveal this point. The CCP is very much like a nefarious and dysfunctional crime family running a nation-state.”
The Epoch Times reached out to Zoom for comment but didn’t receive a response.
Growing Scrutiny
Zoom CEO Eric Yuan admitted in an April 3 blog post that the company “mistakenly” added servers for the app in China.“In our urgency to come to the aid of people around the world during this unprecedented pandemic, we added server capacity and deployed it quickly—starting in China, where the outbreak began,” Yuan said. “In that process, we failed to fully implement our usual geo-fencing best practices. As a result, it is possible certain meetings were allowed to connect to systems in China, where they should not have been able to connect.”
In February, to handle an increase in demand, Yuan said Zoom added two of its Chinese data centers “to a lengthy whitelist of backup bridges, potentially enabling non-Chinese clients to—under extremely limited circumstances—connect to them (namely when the primary non-Chinese servers were unavailable).”
He added that Zoom “immediately took the mainland China data centers off of the whitelist of secondary backup bridges for users outside of China” after learning about the oversight.
“The first time I applied for a U.S. visa, I was rejected,” Yuan said. “I continued to apply again and again over the course of two years, and finally received my visa on the ninth try.”
Zoom is dealing with a heavy load of backlash against a “multi-faceted and often mind-boggling shortsightedness with regard to user privacy and the overall security of its platform,” Attila Tomaschek, data privacy expert at ProPrivacy, told The Epoch Times.
“Beijing theoretically could demand that the encryption keys for those calls be handed over for decryption by Chinese authorities, allowing them full access to the contents of those calls and the ability to listen in on supposedly private conversations,” he said.
The fact that Zoom effectively gave Chinese authorities access to the call data of users in North America, well outside the normal reach of the communist regime, “raises the alarm to a whole new level,” Tomaschek said.
“[Zoom] represents a particularly attractive target for government agencies in gathering intelligence,” he added. “When the company quite literally hands over the keys to an authoritarian government, it presents massive issues with regard to user trust and its overall security practices.”