Landlords in Michigan Fight Forced Provision of Voter Registration Forms to New Tenants

Landlords in Michigan Fight Forced Provision of Voter Registration Forms to New Tenants
A sign for Michigan State University is seen near the campus in East Lansing, Mich., on Feb. 1, 2018. Rebecca Cook/Reuters
Steven Kovac
Updated:
0:00
 It’s been 10 years in the making, but a family of East Lansing, Michigan, landlords finally have their day in court.

The Hagan family, represented by attorneys from the Thomas More Society, filed a civil rights complaint against the city on March 16, in the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Michigan.

The Hagans’ complaint centers on a 2013 city ordinance mandating landlords to provide new tenants with voter registration forms and “how to” information. It requests that the court declare portions of the ordinance unconstitutional and a violation of federal civil rights law.

The ordinance reads in part, “At the time occupancy is given … the owner or owners’ legal agent must provide … information on how to register to vote and the requirements to register, [a] notice that election information and further registration information is available on the Secretary of State’s website as well as the City’s website … and a copy of the State of Michigan Voter Registration Application.“ And finally, ”A violation of this section shall be deemed a civil infraction.”
Attorney Erick G. Kaardal. (Courtesy Erick G. Kaardal)
Attorney Erick G. Kaardal. Courtesy Erick G. Kaardal

“This is a blatant violation of the landlords’ First Amendment rights,” said Thomas More Society Special Counsel Erick Kaardal in a March 17 press release. “East Lansing is out of line.”

Kaardal likened it to the government “conscripting the local grocer to hand out property tax bills” while ringing up his customer’s orders.

“Why would the East Lansing City Council resort to unconstitutional means to register voters but to achieve a political end?” asked Kaardal in a March 20 phone interview with The Epoch Times.

East Lansing is the home of Michigan State University with its more than 50,000 students.

The population of the city of East Lansing was 46,854 in 2021.

When contacted for comment, East Lansing Communications Administrator Mikell Frey told The Epoch Times in an email, “As a general practice, we do not comment on pending litigation.”

Landlords Seek Injunction

The plaintiffs also asked the court for a permanent injunction to stop the city from enforcing the 10-year-old ordinance, now and in the future.

According to the pleadings, the Hagans and other landlords had expressed their opposition to the measure as early as February 2013 at a public hearing held just before the adoption of the ordinance by the city.

At the time, landlord Tom Kashinski asked, “What does voter registration have to do with our relationship with our residents? What does it have to do with behavior issues or safety?... What is the next thing that you would like to require us to do that has nothing to do with our business?”

Collin Cronin, another landlord, stated, “Pushing political agendas or political emphasis isn’t something I believe should be pressed on landlords to do.”

“How extreme are we going to get here?” asked Matt Hagan.

The Penalty for Disobedience

Out of fear of being slapped with a civil infraction penalty, a fine the complaint says could be up to $1,000 and have implications on the landlords’ licenses, the plaintiffs obeyed the terms of the ordinance.

A decade later the arguments against the measure remain the same.

Last week’s court filing asserts, “Increasing citizen participation in elections through registering voters is unrelated to renting a residence to tenants.”

Kaardal stated in the press release, that no matter how acceptable the idea of increasing voter participation is to some, those interests “cannot outweigh the First Amendment rights” of landlords who refuse to pass on the city government’s message.

“By compelling a landlord to inform and provide information to tenants regarding where to register to vote, or by engaging them to act as couriers of the municipality’s ideological messages to prospective tenants, East Lansing is infringing on landlords’ rights,” he said.

“The First Amendment protects an individual’s right to refrain from speaking just as much as it protects the right to speak freely. Compelled speech is a violation of the free speech clause.”

Advancing the Progressive Agenda

As precedent, Thomas More Society attorneys cite a 2020 case in Minnesota where a federal judge declared unconstitutional a similar ordinance involving Minneapolis and Saint Paul when those cities tried to require landlords to provide voter registration information to new tenants.

Kaardal told The Epoch Times that he is concerned about every instance of what he called “biased voter registration programs.”

“Government should be a neutral player,” he said. “It should not be assisting progressives in accomplishing their political purposes.”

The Thomas More Society is a national, not-for-profit, public-interest law firm based in Chicago.

The Society is dedicated to restoring respect in law for life, family, religious liberty, and fair elections, according to its website.

Steven Kovac
Steven Kovac
Reporter
Steven Kovac reports for The Epoch Times from Michigan. He is a general news reporter who has covered topics related to rising consumer prices to election security issues. He can be reached at [email protected]
Related Topics