A Delaware judge this week threw out a lawsuit filed by Candace Owens against so-called fact-checkers.
She said that a description of one of her posts as a “hoax” and “false” was itself false.
But Karsnitz ruled that the phrases did not meet the “reasonable conceivability” standard that state law requires.
The term “hoax alert” that Lead Stories plastered onto a promotion for its article on Facebook “was used as loose, figurative, or hyperbolic language,” the court ruled.
“It is not reasonably conceivable that readers who read the Lead Stories’ Article would have understood ‘Hoax Alert’ to mean that Plaintiffs were intentionally spreading a lie. Instead, the readers would have understood ‘Hoax Alert’ as a rhetorical hyperbole implying that the Owens’ Post carries inaccurate information and that the readers should proceed cautiously when reading the post,” the judge said.
Karsnitz granted motions to dismiss filed by Lead Stories and USA Today.
Martin Schenk, co-founder of the former, said on Twitter, “We won.”
Gannett, USA Today’s parent company, declined to comment.
Todd McMurtry, a lawyer representing Owens, told The Epoch Times in an email that there is a plan to appeal.
“We are disappointed with the court’s decision to dismiss the case. We believe we have strong arguments and will appeal the decision,” he said.